1 day ago

How India’s Taliban Approach Reflects Principled Pragmatism in Afghanistan

How India’s Taliban Approach Reflects Principled Pragmatism in Afghanistan
How India’s approach to the Taliban represents a form of principled pragmatism · indianexpress.com

India does not officially recognise the Taliban government, but it is still talking and working with Taliban officials.

This approach is called cautious engagement or principled pragmatism.

India wants to help Afghan people with food, medicine, development projects and disaster relief.

It also wants to protect its security and economic interests in Afghanistan.

Relations between Pakistan and the Taliban have become more difficult, creating more space for India to engage.

China is also interested in Afghanistan’s security and mineral resources.

India uses education, cricket and trade to build friendly connections with Afghans.

The article says India is trying to help people while avoiding full political recognition of the Taliban.

Afghanistan remains important because events there can affect security across South Asia.

Key facts

India’s diplomatic status
India engages with Taliban authorities but has not formally recognised the Taliban regime.
Afghan returns
A United Nations report cited 2.9 million returns in 2025 and another 1.15 million by 22 August 2026, most described as involuntary.
Major diplomatic engagement
Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi visited New Delhi in October 2025, followed by visits from other Afghan ministers.
Trade
India-Afghanistan bilateral trade reached $907.85 million in 2025-26.
Humanitarian assistance
India has supplied medicines and wheat and cooperated with United Nations agencies and Afghan authorities.
Development and soft power
India supports community development projects, Afghan scholarships, disaster relief and the Shpageeza Cricket League.
Regional context
India’s policy is influenced by deteriorating Afghanistan-Pakistan relations and China’s economic and security interests in Afghanistan.

Quotes

Harish Parvathaneni

India’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations

“A forcible return of this nature that is neither safe nor dignified, of over three million individuals, in any other part of the world would have elicited a political outcry in this Council, urgent provision of large-scale humanitarian support and efforts to ensure better re-integration and assimilation. That there is no such reaction is a sad reflection on the times”
indianexpress.com

Sources

Related news