2 days ago
U.N. Committee Urges Countries to Consider Slave Trade Reparations
A U.N. committee says countries should take action to repair harms linked to the slave trade.
It says this duty comes from a racial-discrimination agreement adopted in 1965.
The committee says it does not matter whether slavery was illegal under the laws of that time.
Countries still have duties today because its effects may continue.
Reparations could include money, official apologies and other actions.
The committee also suggested opening archives and changing public memorials.
It called for independent groups to investigate and record what happened.
Some governments and institutions disagree and say they should not be blamed for crimes committed long ago.
A U.N. committee said countries must consider reparations for the transatlantic slave trade.
The guidance bases these obligations on the 1965 racial-discrimination convention, not historical-era laws.
The committee said current obligations require states to address continuing structural inequalities and discrimination.
It recommended apologies, compensation, archive access, revised memorials and independent truth commissions.
Opponents argue governments and institutions should not be held responsible for historical crimes.
- Who
- The U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, with expert Pela Boker-Wilson, addressed states that are parties to the convention.
- What
- The committee published guidance saying states must consider comprehensive reparations and other measures for people of African descent affected by the slave trade’s continuing legacy.
- Where
- The guidance was issued by the U.N. committee; the report was filed from Geneva, with additional reporting from Paris.
- When
- The guidance was published on Monday; the Reuters report is dated Aug. 31.
- Why
- The committee said racial discrimination and structural inequalities linked to the slave trade persist, creating obligations under the current convention.
Reparations Advocates
Reparations Opponents
Legal responsibility
Reparations Advocates
The committee says states remain bound by present obligations under the racial-discrimination convention, regardless of whether slavery was illegal when it occurred.
Reparations Opponents
Opponents argue that states and institutions should not be held responsible for historical crimes and have used the lack of historical international prohibitions to resist claims.
What reparations should include
Reparations Advocates
The committee supports comprehensive and transformative measures, including compensation, apologies, archive access, revised memorials and truth commissions.
Reparations Opponents
Opponents are described as resisting reparations claims; the articles do not identify specific alternative remedies they support.
Government action
Reparations Advocates
The committee urged states to move beyond expressions of regret and review policies and laws to address continuing inequalities.
Reparations Opponents
Some governments have sought to avoid legal claims by invoking the intertemporality principle, which focuses on the laws in force when the slave trade took place.
Key facts
- Estimated number displaced
- At least 12.5 million Africans were taken and sold between the 15th and 19th centuries.
- Legal basis cited
- The 1965 convention on racial discrimination.
- Recommended remedies
- Official apologies, financial compensation, archive access, revised memorials and independent truth commissions.
- Committee’s position
- Current international obligations apply regardless of how the original historical acts were legally characterized.
- Scope of measures
- The committee called for comprehensive reparatory measures covering all aspects of remedies.
- Recent international response
- The European Union and Britain abstained from a U.N. resolution on slavery in March.
Quotes
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
United Nations committee responsible for monitoring compliance with the racial discrimination convention
“Irrespective of the legal characterization of the original historical acts, States Parties remain bound by their present obligations under the Convention to address structural inequalities.”
theprint.in
“States Parties must implement comprehensive reparatory measures for people of African descent, covering all aspects of remedies.”
theprint.in
Pela Boker-Wilson
Liberian committee expert who helped draft the guidance
“We are calling on state parties to take concrete and meaningful action.”
theprint.in
Sources
Related news
Liberia Agrees to Accept Up to 1,200 US Deportees
Should India apologise for caste injustice, like Nepal did?
India Rejects UN Panel Allegations of Rights Violations
UN Watchdog Urges India to Protect Minorities and Tribals
BRICS Ministers Reject EU Carbon Border Tax as Discriminatory
India Rejects UN Racial Discrimination Remarks as Malicious
UPSC Key Highlights Nepal Floods, Rights, Defence, Nuclear Energy
