1 week ago

India’s Polyester Yarn Boom Faces Insolvency Threat After Rules Withdrawn

India’s Polyester Yarn Boom Faces Insolvency Threat After Rules Withdrawn
India’s Polyester Yarn boom faces insolvency threat after quality rules are withdrawn · thestatesman.com

India’s polyester yarn industry grew quickly after the government required certain quality standards in 2023.

Many small and medium-sized companies built new factories and borrowed money to do this.

In November 2025, the government withdrew those quality requirements.

Manufacturers worry that cheaper imports, especially from China, could now enter the market.

They say these imports may be difficult for Indian companies to match on price.

The industry says its new factories were also intended to support exports, not only Indian customers.

Companies are asking officials to reconsider the change and discuss the issue with them.

They are concerned that changing the rules so soon could make their investments unprofitable.

Key facts

Relevant product category
Polyester Mother Yarn and Mono Polyester Yarn, classified under HSN 5402-4700.
Capacity growth
Estimated annual capacity increased from about 1.25 lakh tonnes to roughly 2.36 lakh tonnes by November 2025.
Reported investment
Approximately Rs 2,691 crore, including about Rs 1,445 crore in bank financing.
Employment
More than 5,000 direct jobs were created, with analysts estimating another 10,000 could eventually be generated.
Domestic requirement
Manufacturers estimate India’s knitting requirement at around 48,000 tonnes annually.
Industry request
The Mother Yarn Association wants the regulatory change reconsidered and consultations held with the Bureau of Indian Standards and relevant ministries.
Earlier precedent
Low Melt Polyester Yarn was classified as a separate speciality product and excluded from Bureau of Indian Standards provisions in July 2024.

Quotes

Mother Yarn and Mono Yarn manufacturers

Indian polyester yarn manufacturers affected by the withdrawn quality control orders

“particularly damaging because companies made capital commitments on the assumption that the regulatory framework would remain in place.”
thestatesman.com
“Rather, the intention was to build an export-oriented production base and establish Indian companies in international markets”
thestatesman.com

Indian government officials

Officials discussing the broader policy implications of the regulatory reversal

“It highlights a recurring dilemma in India’s industrial strategy — How do policymakers encourage domestic manufacturing and attract capital while simultaneously reducing barriers to imports and keeping input costs competitive?”
thestatesman.com

Sources

Related news