5 days ago

Anthropic’s Destructive Book Scanning Raises Copyright and Preservation Fears

Anthropic’s Destructive Book Scanning Raises Copyright and Preservation Fears
AI Rips Through Books and Bytes · deccanchronicle.com

Anthropic reportedly bought many books and cut off their spines so machines could scan the pages quickly.

The scans are intended to help train Claude, its artificial-intelligence model.

Cutting the spines makes the pages flat and easier for scanners to read.

However, it destroys the physical books.

Readers say books are more than words because they carry memories, marks, and history.

Writers are also worried that their work may be used without permission or payment.

Some people fear that books could move from public shelves into private company databases.

Experts say rare books should be handled carefully, while common copies might be scanned in faster ways.

The debate is about balancing technology’s speed with people’s rights and the value of physical books.

Key facts

Company
Anthropic
AI model
Claude
Project
Project Panama
Scanning method
Books are reportedly purchased, their spines removed, and pages processed through high-speed scanners.
Indian locations mentioned
Mumbai’s Flora Fountain, Bengaluru’s Church Street, and Delhi’s Sunday Book Market in Daryaganj.
Main concerns
Copyright, author ownership and credit, public access, cultural preservation, and the destruction of physical books.
Alternative method
V-shaped cradles, controlled lighting, cameras, and automated page-turning can scan books without dismantling them, but more slowly.

Quotes

Akash Anant Saxena

Director at Team Geek Solutions explaining the technical rationale for destructive scanning.

“The primary reason is throughput. Once the spine is removed, a book effectively becomes a stack of loose sheets. Those pages can be passed through high-speed duplex scanners in a largely automated workflow, very similar to industrial document processing. The pages remain flat, lighting is uniform, there is no gutter distortion, and OCR accuracy is generally easier to maintain”
deccanchronicle.com
“Using an author’s original ideas, writing, and story to train a model to write better is horrifying. I feel only anger and rage. I would never give an AI company my book to use for whatever purpose, though I do fear that they already have access to a lot of material related to my work and writing, because a lot of it is available online.”
deccanchronicle.com

Sources

Related news