1 week ago

India’s Chief Justice Sets Limits on AI in Courts

India’s Chief Justice Sets Limits on AI in Courts
AI can't replace judicial conscience: CJI · thehansindia.com

India’s Chief Justice Surya Kant said computers can help courts with some tasks.

They can search for legal information, translate judgments and help people find case updates and procedures.

They may also help with scheduling and writing down spoken words.

However, computers should not make important decisions about people in court.

Judges must decide whether witnesses are believable and whether someone should receive bail.

Kant said human judgment and the law must remain central.

He discussed these ideas with German judge Ulrich Herrmann.

They also talked about mediation and ways to make courts easier to use.

India may create a permanent group to supervise AI in the judiciary.

Key facts

Core principle
AI may augment judicial reasoning but cannot replace judicial conscience, careful adjudication or human judgment.
Current uses
AI is used for legal research, translating judgments into 16 languages and providing case-status and procedural information.
Permitted functions
Draft regulations allow administrative uses such as scheduling, transcription and translation.
Prohibited assessments
The draft rules bar AI from assessing witness credibility, flight risk, recidivism or bail eligibility.
Oversight proposal
A permanent apex body has been proposed to supervise AI adoption and accountability.
Mediation topics
The discussions covered cross-border commercial mediation, recognition and enforcement of mediated settlements, and mediator training.
Possible cooperation
India and Germany discussed an MoU or another arrangement involving court technology, AI, mediation and digital judicial processes.

Quotes

Surya Kant

Chief Justice of India

“Artificial intelligence may augment judicial reasoning, but it cannot substitute judicial conscience. Draft regulations from the Supreme Court's AI Committee permit administrative uses such as scheduling, transcription and translation, while barring AI from assessing witness credibility, flight risk, recidivism or bail eligibility; a permanent apex body has been proposed to supervise the adoption and accountability of AI.”
theprint.in thehansindia.com deccanchronicle.com
“Our two judiciaries share the same underlying responsibility: to preserve judicial independence and public confidence while adapting our institutions to new forms of litigation and new expectations of access.”
theprint.in thehansindia.com deccanchronicle.com

Sources

Related news