7 months ago

Guru-Shishya Tradition and Critical Thinking

Guru-Shishya Tradition and Critical Thinking
Counterview: Guru-shishya tradition did not kill critical thinking – we just forgot how it worked · scroll.in

A recent article suggested that India's guru-shishya tradition discouraged critical thinking.

However, Dr. Aakash Kembhavi, an ayurvedic practitioner, disagrees.

He explains that classical texts like the Charaka Samhita and Rig Veda actually encouraged questioning and debate.

These texts included dialogues where students challenged their teachers, and they valued evidence and logic over blind authority.

The tradition had rules for fair debates and required considering opposing views.

Over time, political and economic problems, along with colonialism, weakened this tradition.

Dr. Kembhavi argues that the tradition itself was not the problem, but the way it was practiced later on.

He believes that understanding the original methods can help bring back critical thinking in education.

Key facts

Author
Dr. Aakash Kembhavi
Profession
Ayurvedic Practitioner
Key Texts
Charaka Samhita, Upanishads, Rig Veda
Debate Types
Vada, Jalpa, Vitanda
Logical Principles
Tantrayukti (36 principles)
Key Principle
Yukti (empirical evidence and logic over tradition)
Historical Degradation Factors
Political instability, economic pressures, colonial disruption

Sources

Related news