Politics · Brazil · 1 hr ago
Brazil’s election courts face growing distrust over perceived partisanship
Brazil’s Superior Electoral Court has become a focus of distrust as it handles disputes during an election.
The court is meant to organize elections and ensure candidates compete on equal terms.
Campaigns have used false information and filed many cases, putting pressure on judges to respond.
The editorial says judges should remain neutral arbiters rather than become central political actors.
The Supreme Federal Court’s political divisions have also affected the electoral court, especially late in the first round and during the runoff.
The editorial argues that unity among the higher courts is needed to fight misinformation and protect trust in the election’s legal safeguards.
Brazil’s Electoral Superior Court has become a focus of public distrust, alongside the Supreme Federal Court, amid perceptions that the courts are partisan.
A Folha editorial says the electoral courts’ role is to organize elections and ensure equal conditions for candidates.
It argues that courts risk undermining that role when they become protagonists in an election.
The editorial says disinformation and campaign use of technology have increased pressure on judges.
It calls for judicial unity and impartiality to protect trust in the courts.
- Who
- Brazil’s Electoral Superior Court and Supreme Federal Court are at the centre of the criticism.
- What
- A Folha editorial says the courts have given rise to perceptions of partisanship and warns that their credibility is at risk.
- When
- The article was published on 13 October 2026.
- Where
- Brazil.
- Why
- The editorial cites disinformation, campaign litigation and divisions in the courts as contributing to distrust.
This story does not have two clearly opposing sides.
This story does not have a timeline yet.
- Publication date
- 13 October 2026
- Courts named
- Electoral Superior Court and Supreme Federal Court
- Electoral court role
- Organize elections and ensure equal conditions for candidates
- Main concern
- Perceptions that the courts are partisan
- Editorial’s call
- Unity among higher courts and judicial impartiality
What people are saying
The fight against disinformation and the protection of civility and a balance of forces in the election require unity among the higher courts.
The courts should preserve themselves as arbiters, so voters can clearly see the separation between right and wrong under the law.









