1 week ago
Election Commission Rejects Dissent Allegations Over Form 6 Changes
The Election Commission said its decisions were made unanimously.
However, two commissioners reportedly disagreed with changes to a voter-registration form.
The form is called Form 6.
It is used by people applying to become registered voters.
The commissioners described the changes as illegal and unauthorised.
The changed form asked applicants about their own or relatives’ presence on earlier electoral rolls.
Reports said the changed form continued to be used.
The articles do not explain why the disagreement occurred or when it happened.
The Election Commission said all decisions were taken unanimously.
Two commissioners reportedly objected to changes made to Form 6.
Form 6 is used for new voter registrations.
The commissioners called the changes “illegal” and “unauthorised.”
The altered form reportedly remained in use despite their objections.
- Who
- The Election Commission and two commissioners who reportedly objected to changes in Form 6.
- What
- A dispute over alleged dissent and changes to the voter-registration Form 6.
- Where
- Not specified in the provided article.
- When
- Not specified in the provided article.
- Why
- The two commissioners objected to changes they described as “illegal” and “unauthorised”; the reason for the changes was not stated.
Election Commission’s Position
Objecting Commissioners’ Position
Whether decisions were unanimous
Election Commission’s Position
The Election Commission said that all decisions were taken unanimously.
Objecting Commissioners’ Position
Two commissioners reportedly raised objections, indicating disagreement over the Form 6 changes.
Legality of Form 6 changes
Election Commission’s Position
The Election Commission’s statement did not acknowledge the changes as illegal or unauthorised.
Objecting Commissioners’ Position
The two commissioners labelled the changes “illegal” and “unauthorised.”
Continued use of altered form
Election Commission’s Position
The altered form reportedly remained in use, consistent with the reported implementation of the changes.
Objecting Commissioners’ Position
The commissioners objected to the changes even though the altered form continued to be used.
Key facts
- Form
- Form 6
- Purpose
- Used for new voter registrations
- Election Commission position
- All decisions were taken unanimously
- Reported objections
- Two commissioners objected to changes in Form 6
- Description of changes
- The commissioners called them “illegal” and “unauthorised”
- Additional questions
- Applicants were asked about their or their relatives’ presence in previous electoral rolls
- Status of altered form
- It reportedly remained in use despite the objections
Sources
Related news
Election Commissioners Challenge Form 6 Changes Linked to SIR
Election Commission Says SIR Decisions Were Unanimous After Rift Report
Election Commission Faces Scrutiny Over Electoral Roll Procedures
Former CEC Calls Form 6 Changes Illegal Amid EC Rift
Election Commissioners Raised 14 Objections to SIR Process
Election Commission Silence Deepens Dispute Over Form 6 Changes
Congress Challenges Election Commission’s SIR and Form 6 Defence
