1 week ago

Lawyers Demand BCI Chief’s Resignation Over NALSAR Order

Lawyers Demand BCI Chief’s Resignation Over NALSAR Order
‘BCI letterhead is not personal stationery’: Lawyers, CJP seek Manan Mishra’s exit over NALSAR row · telegraphindia.com

Lawyers protested against the head of the Bar Council of India, Manan Kumar Mishra.

They wanted him to resign.

The disagreement began when some students at NALSAR objected to inviting Chief Justice Surya Kant to their convocation.

The Bar Council then temporarily stopped the entire graduating class from enrolling as lawyers.

Many people said it was unfair to punish all students for the actions of a few.

The order was withdrawn within hours.

Mishra apologised if his words or the council’s letter had hurt students.

The Chief Justice declined the invitation, while the council said its investigation would continue.

Key facts

Protest organiser
The All India Young Advocates Association called the demonstration.
Protest supporters
The Cockroach Janta Party backed the protest and the resignation demand.
Main demand
Protesters sought the resignation of Bar Council of India chairman Manan Kumar Mishra.
Original BCI directive
State Bar Councils were told not to enrol NALSAR’s 2026 graduating batch as advocates.
Order reversal
The BCI withdrew the directive within hours and clarified that all 2026 graduates could enrol with the State Bar Council of their choice.
Mishra’s response
Mishra apologised if his words or the BCI’s communication had hurt law students.
CJI’s decision
Surya Kant declined NALSAR’s invitation and said he had never consented to it.
Continuing inquiry
The BCI said its investigation into the controversy would continue.

Quotes

Manan Kumar Mishra

Chairman of the Bar Council of India

“If anything connected with the present controversy, any of my words, or letter, has hurt the feelings of our law students, I sincerely regret and apologise for the same.”
deccanchronicle.com
“Manan Mishra has been the BCI chairman for seven consecutive terms over a period of 14 years, but has never protected lawyers or stood by them”
telegraphindia.com

Sources

Related news