2 weeks ago
Bar Council's NALSAR ban over student dissent sparks political backlash
Some law students in India did not want the country's top judge to speak at their graduation ceremony, so they wrote a letter to ask their university to choose someone else.
About 70 students signed that letter.
The Bar Council of India, the group that decides who can become a lawyer, got upset and ordered that none of those graduates could become lawyers for now.
The Council also asked the university to give it the names of the students and teachers who wrote the letter within three days.
Many politicians and famous lawyers said this was unfair.
They said students have a right to disagree peacefully, and punishing an entire graduating class for one letter is too harsh.
Some people were also upset because the head of the Council is a member of the ruling party in parliament.
The protesters said they would gather outside the Council's office and the chairman's home if the order was not cancelled.
The Council's chairman, Manan Kumar Mishra, is being asked to withdraw the order, but so far the decision stays.
The Bar Council of India barred all 2026 NALSAR University of Law graduates from enrolling as advocates 'till further orders'.
The action followed a letter from roughly 70 graduating students opposing CJI Surya Kant as the convocation chief guest.
The BCI also ordered the Vice-Chancellor to hand over names of every student and faculty member behind the letter within three days.
Politicians and the Cockroach Janta Party condemned the order as disproportionate, vindictive and a blow to democratic dissent.
Critics including Prashant Bhushan, Ajay Maken and Mahua Moitra demanded the directive be withdrawn and threatened protests if it was not.
- Who
- Bar Council of India chairman Manan Kumar Mishra, NALSAR University of Law's 2026 graduates, and critics including Prashant Bhushan, Ajay Maken, Mahua Moitra and the Cockroach Janta Party.
- What
- The BCI ordered state bar councils not to enrol any 2026 NALSAR graduate after about 70 students opposed inviting CJI Surya Kant as convocation chief guest.
- Where
- India — involving NALSAR University of Law in Hyderabad and the Bar Council of India.
- When
- The backlash occurred on a Thursday (exact dates not specified in the article), following the students' letter and the BCI order.
- Why
- Because students exercised their right to dissent against the CJI's proposed convocation role; critics say the enrollment freeze amounts to political retaliation.
Critics and Opposition Politicians
Bar Council of India
Enrollment freeze over student dissent
Critics and Opposition Politicians
Critics call the BCI order 'grossly disproportionate, deeply troubling, and prima facie indefensible'; students cannot be collectively penalised for expressing dissent over a ceremonial invitation, and the ban is 'vindictive, arbitrary, illegal and wholly unacceptable'.
Bar Council of India
The BCI directed that no State Bar Council enrol any 2026 graduate of NALSAR Hyderabad 'till further orders' over the campus opposition, and ordered the Vice-Chancellor to hand over the names of every student and faculty member behind the letter within three days.
Chairman Mishra's political role
Critics and Opposition Politicians
Critics say a statutory body headed by a sitting BJP Rajya Sabha member is wielding its powers as an instrument of political retaliation, and question how Mishra was allowed to helm the council for over 10 years.
Bar Council of India
Manan Kumar Mishra is the sitting Chairman of the Bar Council of India and a BJP Rajya Sabha member who signed the directive; the article does not report any defence of the order.
Key facts
- Regulator
- Bar Council of India (BCI)
- BCI Chairperson
- Manan Kumar Mishra, BJP Rajya Sabha member
- Affected university
- NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad
- Affected batch
- 2026 graduates
- Trigger
- Letter by roughly 70 graduating students opposing CJI Surya Kant as convocation chief guest
- Directive
- No State Bar Council to enrol any 2026 NALSAR graduate 'till further orders'
- Demand to university
- Names of students and faculty behind the letter within three days
- Main critics
- Cockroach Janta Party, Prashant Bhushan, Ajay Maken, Mahua Moitra, Anish Gawande, Priyanka Bharti
Quotes
Saurav Das
Spokesperson for the Chief Justice of India’s supporters, the Cockroach Janta Party
“Grossly disproportionate, deeply troubling, and prima facie indefensible. Students cannot be collectively penalised for expressing dissent over a ceremonial invitation. The Cockroach Janta Party condemns this order.”
telegraphindia.com
Ajay Maken
Congress MP and political critic of the Bar Council
“Punishing hundreds of young graduates and threatening their careers for expressing an opinion strikes at the very foundations of our democracy. The BCI must withdraw this directive immediately.”
telegraphindia.com
Sources
Related news
Lawyers Demand BCI Chief’s Resignation Over NALSAR Order
Student Body Demands Apology After BCI Withdraws NALSAR Enrolment Ban
NLSIU students demand BCI apology over revoked NALSAR enrolment order
Bar Council Halts, Then Lifts NALSAR Graduate Enrolment Ban
CJI Slams BCI, CJP Demands Mishra's Resignation in NALSAR Row
CJI rebukes Bar Council of India chief over NALSAR ban
Mahua Moitra Questions India’s 7.8% GDP Growth Figures
Press Bodies Challenge FIR Over ABP's 'Gerua Gundami' Report
Mahua Moitra Faces Black-Flag Protest During Bengal Visit
Calcutta High Court Orders Protection for Mahua Moitra
Supreme Court Defers Lokpal Pleas in Mahua Moitra Case
