2 weeks ago
SC Told Regulator Cannot Run Institution It Regulates
The Supreme Court is the highest court in India.
A lawyer named Prashant Bhushan spoke to the judges on Monday.
He said that a group that makes rules for something should not also run that thing.
He was talking about the Bar Council of India, which makes rules for law colleges.
The Bar Council also runs a law college itself.
Bhushan thinks that is not fair.
He said he will ask the court to stop the Bar Council from running the law college.
The discussion happened during a case about money for people hurt in nuclear accidents.
The judges will decide what to do next.
The Supreme Court was told that a regulatory body cannot operate an institution it is meant to regulate.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan made the submission before a bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant.
Bhushan said he would file a petition challenging the Bar Council of India's running of a law college.
The Bar Council of India is the regulatory body for law colleges.
The submission came in a case concerning fair and just compensation under the SHANTI Act for nuclear accidents.
- Who
- Advocate Prashant Bhushan, a bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, and the Bar Council of India
- What
- A submission that a regulatory body cannot run an institution it regulates, with a planned petition against the Bar Council of India operating a law college
- Where
- The Supreme Court of India
- When
- Monday
- Why
- Because the Bar Council of India, as the regulator of law colleges, should not itself operate a law college
Key facts
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Key submission
- A regulatory body cannot operate an institution it is sought to regulate
- Advocate
- Prashant Bhushan
- Bench head
- Chief Justice of India Surya Kant
- Target of petition
- Bar Council of India (BCI)
- Issue
- BCI running a law college despite being the regulator for law colleges
- Related case
- Fair and just compensation under the SHANTI Act for nuclear accidents











