1 week ago

Delhi High Court Rejects Jockey Plea Over Race Club Eviction

Delhi High Court Rejects Jockey Plea Over Race Club Eviction
HC dismisses plea by Jockey Association challenging eviction from Delhi Race Club · indianexpress.com

The Delhi Race Club has been told to leave its land in New Delhi.

A government officer gave the club 15 days to vacate.

The Jockey Association of India asked the court to stop the eviction.

It said jockeys, trainers, stable workers and horse owners depend on the club.

It also said the club is the only specialised thoroughbred racing facility in north India.

The government says the club’s old lease ended in 1994 and the land is needed for a public purpose.

The Delhi High Court did not decide the association’s broader complaints because it said the association was not part of the lease.

The race club itself has already appealed against the eviction order.

Key facts

Court ruling
Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar held that the association’s petition was not maintainable.
Eviction deadline
An August 11 Estate Officer order directed the Delhi Race Club to vacate within 15 days.
Premises
The club occupies approximately 53.24 acres, also described in the report as 53 acres.
Original lease
The Centre says the 1926 lease initially covered 84.48 acres and expired on December 31, 1994.
Legal process
Authorities proceeded under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971.
Association’s argument
The association says eviction would threaten employment and leave members without facilities to stable, train and exercise horses.
Club’s appeal
The Delhi Race Club, rather than the association, has separately appealed against the eviction order.

Quotes

Jockey Association of India

Association that petitioned against the Delhi Race Club’s eviction order

“The Impugned Order, without providing any alternate facility, would therefore leave the Petitioners with nowhere to stable, train and exercise their horses, directly affecting their rights under Articles 19(1)(g) and 21 and placing their valuable horses and livelihood at grave risk.”
theprint.in
“The Respondents’ bare assertion that the land is required for “public purpose”, without disclosing what that purpose is, how the land is proposed to be utilised, or where and how the existing racing and equestrian activities are to be accommodated, is arbitrary and irrational.”
theprint.in

Sources

Related news