7 months ago

Supreme Court Distinguishes Freebies from Welfare Schemes

Supreme Court Distinguishes Freebies from Welfare Schemes
Better use: Editorial on Supreme Court's distinction between freebies and welfare schemes · telegraphindia.com

The Supreme Court of India recently made a big distinction between freebies given to voters during elections and welfare schemes for the poor.

Freebies are seen as a waste of money and a corrupt practice, while welfare schemes like free medical care and education are part of the government's duty to help the less privileged.

The court said that using public money for development is better than spending it on freebies.

This is a reminder to political parties that they should focus on governance and helping people rather than just trying to win elections by giving out free things.

The court's comments go beyond just election time and highlight the long-term damage that freebies can cause to resources.

It's important for the government to use money wisely to fulfill the constitutional ideal of inclusivity.

Key facts

Supreme Court
Made distinction between freebies and welfare schemes
Freebies
Considered a waste of resources and a corrupt practice
Welfare Schemes
Part of the State's commitment to inclusivity
Representation of the People Act
Section 123 lists bribery as a corrupt practice
Supreme Court's 2013 Pronouncement
Promises in election manifestos not considered corrupt practice
Recent Comments
Criticize free gifts and exploitation of public finances
Developmental Schemes
Include free medical care and education for the poor

Sources

Related news