2 days ago

Himalayan Towns Face Limits as Urbanisation Strains Mountain Systems

Himalayan Towns Face Limits as Urbanisation Strains Mountain Systems
At breaking point: How much more urbanisation can the mountains take? · firstpost.com

Himalayan towns are getting bigger, but mountains have limited space and fragile natural systems.

Roads, hotels, homes, and other buildings can affect forests, streams, slopes, and the places where water collects underground.

A study found that Nainital can physically hold far more people than its water, sanitation, and other systems can effectively support.

Other hill towns also face problems with waste, sewage, traffic, and water supply.

Construction in risky places can make the effects of heavy rain and unstable slopes worse.

Experts say each project should be planned with the whole mountain valley in mind.

Some damage, such as harm to drainage or water recharge areas, may be partly repaired.

Other changes may be very difficult or impossible to reverse.

The goal, they say, should be to grow only where the mountains can safely support it.

Key facts

Nainital effective carrying capacity
About 8,400 people a day, according to a 2026 National Institute of Urban Affairs study.
Nainital physical carrying capacity
More than 834,000 people a day, according to the same study.
Urban-area growth
Seven Himalayan capital cities’ combined urban area increased 831% from 1972 to 2015; their population increased 333%.
Manali peak-period waste
About 35 tonnes of solid waste per day.
Manali sewage capacity
Estimated sewage generation is 15–16 million litres a day, against treatment capacity of 1.82 million litres.
Shimla water reforms
Supply improved to three to four hours a day from once every three days; non-revenue water fell 10%, and sewage collection rose 133%.
Himalayan Urban Bio-Sheds project
A three-year project sanctioned Rs 10.98 crore, covering towns in Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, and Sikkim.

Quotes

Prakash Tiwari

Professor emeritus of geography at Kumaun University and senior fellow at CEDAR.

“The problem, therefore, is not infrastructure development itself. It is development without adequate respect for mountain geology, water and the cumulative effects of multiple projects within the same valley.”
firstpost.com
“We should stop asking how much more development a hill station can accommodate and start asking how much ecological capacity remains, and how much of that capacity can be restored.”
firstpost.com

Sources

Related news