9 hrs ago
Judge Extends Temporary Lift on White House Media Ban
A judge is temporarily letting reporters from CNN, MS NOW and Politico access the White House grounds.
The judge is considering whether that permission should last longer while their lawsuit continues.
The outlets say the ban on their reporters was unfair and violated their rights.
The government says the president can restrict access to protect national security.
The judge questioned whether the outlets received enough warning before the ban began.
He also asked why national security was being used as a reason when it was not cited at first.
The temporary order prevents the ban from being enforced until the judge rules.
He said he would make a decision by Oct.
13.
U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Kelly extended until Tuesday an order allowing CNN, MS NOW and Politico journalists onto White House grounds.
Kelly said he would rule by Oct. 13, and the ban cannot be enforced before then.
The outlets argue the ban violates their First Amendment rights and Fifth Amendment due-process protections.
Kelly questioned whether the administration gave enough advance notice and challenged its reliance on national security and journalistic standards.
The administration says the president has broad discretion to protect national security and accused the outlets of publishing confidential information.
- Who
- U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Kelly; the lawsuit was brought by CNN, MS NOW and Politico against the Trump administration.
- What
- Kelly briefly extended an order preventing enforcement of a White House media-access ban while he considers whether to grant longer-term relief.
- Where
- White House grounds; the case is in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
- When
- The extension runs until Tuesday; Kelly said he would rule by Oct. 13.
- Why
- The outlets are challenging the ban as a violation of First Amendment and Fifth Amendment protections; the administration cites national security and journalistic standards.
Media outlets
Trump administration
Constitutionality and press access
Media outlets
The outlets argue the ban is unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination and violates their First Amendment rights.
Trump administration
The administration says the president has broad discretion to make access decisions.
Notice and process
Media outlets
The outlets say the administration offered a sham process and did not provide adequate advance notice.
Trump administration
The administration defends the access decision and argues the president may act to safeguard national security.
Reasons for the ban
Media outlets
The outlets challenge the administration's reliance on national security and journalistic standards as justifications.
Trump administration
The administration accuses the outlets of publishing confidential information that poses a threat and cites national security and journalistic standards.
Key facts
- Judge
- U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Kelly
- Outlets
- CNN, MS NOW and Politico
- Temporary access
- The order allowing access is extended until Tuesday.
- Expected ruling
- Kelly said he would rule by Oct. 13, possibly sooner.
- Legal claims
- The outlets allege violations of the First Amendment and Fifth Amendment.
- Administration's stated grounds
- National security and journalistic standards
- Case
- Cable News Network v. Trump, 26-cv-3287, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Sources
Related news
Judge Orders Temporary Restoration of Trump Press Access
Judge Weighs News Outlets’ Bid to Keep White House Ban Blocked
CNN, MS NOW and Politico Regain White House Access
Trump's White House Media Ban Faces Legal Challenge
Trump Questions Order Restoring White House Media Access
News Outlets Seek Court Order Blocking Trump White House Ban
Media Outlets Fight Trump White House Ban in Court
CNN Enters Skydance Era as Editorial Independence Faces Scrutiny
