9 hrs ago
DOJ Defends White House Restrictions on CNN, MS NOW, Politico
The Justice Department wants a court to keep restrictions on CNN, MS NOW and Politico in place.
The three news outlets disagree with the administration's reasons.
They have asked the court to stop the restrictions while their lawsuit continues.
The White House pointed to the outlets' reporting.
The outlets say that kind of reporting is protected by the First Amendment.
They also say the restrictions hurt press freedom.
They argue that losing access without proper process violated their rights.
The court is being asked to consider the dispute.
The Justice Department asked a court to uphold White House restrictions affecting CNN, MS NOW and Politico.
The outlets rejected the administration's reasoning and asked the court to block enforcement while their lawsuit proceeds.
The White House cited reporting by the outlets as a reason for the restrictions.
The outlets argue that the reporting is journalism protected by the First Amendment.
They also describe the restrictions as an attack on press freedoms and allege that revoking their access violated due-process rights.
- Who
- The Justice Department, the White House, CNN, MS NOW and Politico.
- What
- The Justice Department asked a court to uphold restrictions affecting the three outlets; the outlets seek to block enforcement during their lawsuit.
- Where
- The dispute concerns the outlets' access to the White House.
- When
- Why
- The White House cited the outlets' reporting; the outlets say it is protected journalism and that revoking their access violated press freedoms and due-process rights.
Administration
News outlets
Restrictions on outlet access
Administration
The Justice Department is asking the court to uphold the White House restrictions.
News outlets
CNN, MS NOW and Politico want enforcement blocked while their lawsuit proceeds.
Reporting and press freedoms
Administration
The White House cited the outlets' reporting in support of the restrictions.
News outlets
The outlets say the reporting is protected by the First Amendment and characterize the restrictions as an attack on press freedoms.
Revocation of access
Administration
The administration's position, as described here, is that the restrictions should remain in place.
News outlets
The outlets argue that revoking their access violated their due-process rights.
Key facts
- Government position
- The Justice Department asked the court to uphold the restrictions.
- Outlets affected
- CNN, MS NOW and Politico.
- Outlets' request
- Block enforcement while their lawsuit proceeds.
- White House rationale
- The White House cited reporting by the outlets.
- First Amendment claim
- The outlets say the cited reporting is journalism protected by the First Amendment.
- Due-process claim
- The outlets argue that revoking their access violated their due-process rights.
Sources
Related news
Trump Says Banned Outlets Could Return After Court Ruling
CNN, MS NOW and Politico Sue Over White House Ban
Judge Orders Temporary Restoration of Trump Press Access
Trump Ban Denies CNN, MS NOW, Politico White House Access
CNN, MS NOW and Politico Regain White House Access
Trump Ban Blocks CNN, MS NOW, Politico From White House
Trump Questions Order Restoring White House Media Access
News Outlets Seek Court Order Blocking Trump White House Ban
Trump Bans CNN, MS NOW and Politico From White House
