2 hrs ago

States Struggle to Meet Supreme Court Menstrual Hygiene Mandate

States Struggle to Meet Supreme Court Menstrual Hygiene Mandate
8 months after SC’s menstrual hygiene mandate, states report major implementation gaps—Centre affidavit · theprint.in

The Supreme Court told schools to make periods safer and easier for girl students.

Schools must provide separate working toilets, water, free sanitary napkins, and safe ways to throw them away.

A new government report says many schools have not completed these tasks.

Some schools have toilets but do not have enough cleaners or water.

Many schools also do not have machines or other systems for providing sanitary napkins.

Chandigarh reported that all its schools provide access to napkins, but Puducherry reported the facility in only 36.2% of schools.

The court said rules are not useful if students cannot use the toilets or find water.

It ordered local education officials to organize surprise checks at every school.

Key facts

Court requirements
Functional gender-segregated toilets, usable water, free sanitary napkins, and environmentally friendly waste disposal in schools.
Full toilet compliance
Delhi, Punjab, Goa, Assam, Daman & Diu, Lakshadweep, and Puducherry reported the required toilet and hand-washing facilities in all schools.
Cleaning gap
More than 2,400 schools in Arunachal Pradesh reported having no cleaners; only 1% of Jharkhand’s 35,457 schools reported cleaners.
Sanitary-pad vending machines
Only six states reported full compliance with covered waste-bin requirements; vending-machine coverage varied widely across states.
Puducherry access
All schools reported having vending machines, but free sanitary-pad arrangements covered 36.2% of schools.
Bihar and Andhra Pradesh
Vending machines were reported in 2.6% of more than 95,000 Bihar schools and 5% of 61,079 Andhra Pradesh schools.
Court response
The Supreme Court directed District Education Officers to form teacher teams for surprise inspections of every school.

Quotes

Varun Thakur

Advocate who appeared for the petitioner in the Supreme Court matter

“This was a landmark judgement where the court read menstrual hygiene as an important facet of the right to live with dignity as well as a girl student’s right to education. These directives cannot remain on paper and only a court-appointed independent panel can monitor its implementation”
theprint.in

Sources

Related news