3 weeks ago
Delhi High Court dismisses PIL seeking Parliament security review
Someone asked a judge to help make the Indian Parliament safer.
They reminded everyone about a big attack on Parliament in 2001 and a security problem in 2023.
They wanted the judge to order leaders to check all of Parliament's security, like computers, rules and other safety systems.
The judge said no.
The judge explained that courts do not tell Parliament how to take care of itself.
He said Parliament can look after its own security.
He also said the government should deal with this issue, not the court.
The judge threw the case out.
He said not every idea can become a court case.
So Parliament will keep making its own security choices.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL concerning Parliament's safety and seeking to ensure its uninterrupted constitutional functioning.
The petition cited the 2001 terror attack on the Parliament complex and the 2023 security breach.
It sought a comprehensive review of Parliament's security framework, including administrative, institutional, operational, technological and cyber-security mechanisms.
The bench said it cannot issue directions on how Parliament's administrative and operational mechanisms should function.
The court said Parliament's security must be handled by the government and that not every thought can become the subject of a PIL.
- Who
- A Delhi High Court bench comprising Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia; an unnamed petitioner who filed the PIL.
- What
- Dismissed a PIL seeking a comprehensive review of Parliament's security framework and its uninterrupted constitutional functioning.
- Where
- Delhi High Court, New Delhi.
- When
- Wednesday (exact date not specified in the article).
- Why
- The court held that Parliament's security and functioning are not matters for judicial direction and must be handled by Parliament and the government.
Petitioner's View
Court's View
Judicial role in Parliament security
Petitioner's View
A comprehensive review of Parliament's security framework is the 'need of the hour', and courts should direct authorities to ensure its uninterrupted constitutional functioning given past attacks and breaches.
Court's View
Directing how Parliament's administrative and operational security mechanisms function is not a court function; Parliament is capable of taking care of its own security and the issue must be handled by the government.
Key facts
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Bench
- Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia
- Petition
- Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on Parliament security
- Relief sought
- Comprehensive review of Parliament's security framework, including administrative, institutional, operational, technological and cyber-security mechanisms
- Incidents cited
- 2001 terror attack on the Parliament complex; 2023 security breach
- Court's ruling
- Dismissed; said Parliament security is for the government to handle, not the court
- Location
- New Delhi
- Hearing date
- Wednesday (exact date not specified)
Quotes
Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia
Delhi High Court bench
“These are not the functions of the court.”
thehansindia.com
“What kind of a petition is this?”
thehansindia.com
Sources
Related news
Right to Protest Can't Extend to Attacking Courts: Jharkhand Court
Delhi High Court questions Jantar Mantar as protest site
Delhi High Court questions keeping Jantar Mantar open for protests
Delhi HC asks Centre to give Pappu Yadav additional PSO
Punjab Haryana HC Upholds Peaceful Protest Right, Warns Against Violence
Supreme Court Leaves CJP September 5 March To Authorities
SC, ST MPs Demand Action Over Kharge Purification Ritual
Centre Rejects 2.6% GDP Claim, Defends 7.8% Growth
Supreme Court Questions BCI Chairman’s Proposed Five-Year Tenure
Revanth Reddy Seeks Stern Action Against Minister Konda Surekha
NITI Aayog Member Calls for Green Finance for Nuclear Energy
