Politics · India · 2 hrs ago
Rahul Gandhi’s election petition misses October 13 hearing over filing defects
Rahul Gandhi and other opposition leaders filed a petition in India’s Supreme Court on October 12.
They seek full records and decisions from the Election Commission of India on its Special Intensive Revision of voter rolls.
The petition also calls for an independent probe into allegations that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar used his powers unilaterally, leading to voter deletions and changes.
The petition was not listed for an October 13 hearing because the Supreme Court Registry identified routine filing defects.
These reportedly include unpaid court fees and missing authorisation documents for some petitioners; Gandhi’s legal team says it will fix them.
Once the defects are corrected, the petition can be numbered and assigned to a bench for an initial hearing.
Rahul Gandhi-led petition seeking disclosure of Election Commission records and an independent probe was not listed for a Supreme Court hearing on October 13.
The petition remains with the Supreme Court Registry because of clerical defects.
The filing reportedly has more than 10 defects, including a court-fee deficit and missing vakalatnamas for some petitioners.
Gandhi’s legal team said the defects would be corrected and that the Registry had found no other faults in the petition’s legal and constitutional arguments.
The petition concerns the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision and allegations of voter deletions and modifications.
- Who
- Rahul Gandhi and other Opposition leaders, including Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, filed the petition.
- What
- They seek disclosure of Election Commission records and decisions on the Special Intensive Revision and an independent probe into allegations of unilateral action.
- When
- Filed on October 12, 2026; it was not listed for hearing on October 13.
- Where
- The Supreme Court of India.
- Why
- The petition seeks to address alleged voter deletions and modifications linked to the Special Intensive Revision and the Chief Election Commissioner’s exercise of power.
This story does not have two clearly opposing sides.
Gandhi and Kharge made a representation seeking permission to meet the Chief Justice of India.
The Chief Justice replied, noting that similar matters were scheduled for hearing on October 13 and advising the leaders that they could file a petition on October 12.
The petition was filed in the evening while Gandhi led a march to the Supreme Court.
The petition was not listed for hearing because it remained with the Registry over clerical defects.
- Filing date
- October 12, 2026
- Scheduled hearing date
- October 13, 2026
- Reported defects
- More than 10
- Court-fee issue
- Deficit in court fees
- Missing documents
- Vakalatnamas for some petitioners
- Subject
- Election Commission records and decisions on the Special Intensive Revision
What people are saying
You have my assurance that any such petition shall be heard at the earliest possible opportunity, in accordance with law.
contemplated under the Supreme Court Rules and would be cured in due course




