Politics · Brazil · 1 hr ago
Column argues Lula’s government has failed to protect political debate
Lula won Brazil’s 2022 presidential election by 2,139,645 votes over Jair Bolsonaro, a margin of less than 2 percent.
The column argues that election authorities, led by the Superior Electoral Court, ordered content and accounts removed in ways that disproportionately affected Lula’s critics.
It cites posts linking Lula to crime or abortion rights, as well as a documentary about the attack on Bolsonaro, as examples of what it calls censorship.
The author says Lula’s government did not show the restraint that a narrow win should have encouraged.
The column criticizes appointments and public statements on racial language, and says voters are more concerned about safety, corruption and purchasing power.
It also points to the Banco Master case, saying the bank was liquidated in November 2025 and its owner was arrested.
The column says the case has reached Lula’s political circle, including a search of the home of then-Senate PT leader Jaques Wagner, while allegations about support for the bank remain under investigation.
A Folha opinion column argues that Lula’s government has failed to protect political debate and has continued a pattern of censorship that affected critics.
The column says the Superior Electoral Court ordered content removals during the 2022 presidential election, disproportionately affecting profiles critical of Lula and the electoral system.
It argues that Lula’s government did not deliver the broad-based administration promised during the campaign.
The column criticizes the government’s focus on identity politics and says it should have prioritized insecurity, corruption and the loss of purchasing power.
It also cites the Banco Master fraud and investigations involving people close to the government as evidence of a wider corruption problem.
- Who
- A Folha opinion columnist criticizes President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s government.
- What
- The column argues that the government has failed to protect political debate and criticizes censorship, its governing priorities and corruption scandals.
- When
- Published on 12 October 2026; it discusses events from the 2022 election onward.
- Where
- Brazil.
- Why
- The columnist argues that censorship affected critics of Lula and that the government has not focused enough on issues such as insecurity, corruption and purchasing power.
This story does not have two clearly opposing sides.
black hole
racial literacy
Lula won the presidential election runoff by 2,139,645 votes, and the column says the Superior Electoral Court ordered removals of election-related content.
Anielle Franco said expressions such as “black hole” and “denigrate” have racist connotations and should be avoided.
The Central Bank placed Banco Master into extrajudicial liquidation, and the column says its owner, Vorcaro, was arrested.
- 2022 runoff
- Lula won by 2,139,645 votes more than Jair Bolsonaro.
- Superior Electoral Court
- The column says it ordered the removal of election-related content.
- November 2023
- Anielle Franco commented on the expressions “black hole” and “denigrate.
- Banco Master
- The Central Bank ordered the bank’s extrajudicial liquidation in November 2025.










