8 months ago

Telangana HC Criticizes Land Regularization Favoring Mayor

Telangana HC Criticizes Land Regularization Favoring Mayor
Telangana HC Ticks Off Government on Land Regularisation · deccanchronicle.com

The Telangana High Court is upset with the government for giving land to the city's mayor and her brother at very cheap prices.

The court says this is not fair because the land is worth much more.

The court wants the government to fix this and make sure everyone pays the same price for land.

The mayor and her brother got the land for just ₹2,500 and ₹350 per square yard, but the real price is ₹60,300 per square yard.

The court doesn't want to take the land away, but it wants everyone to follow the same rules.

The next hearing is on January 7, 2026.

Additionally, the court has issued notices to two senior IAS officers for not following the court's orders regarding an RTI case.

The officers have to explain why they didn't follow the orders by January 9, 2026.

Key facts

Court
Telangana High Court
Beneficiaries
GHMC Mayor Gadwal Vijayalakshmi and K. Venkateshwar Rao
Land Area
1,161 sq yards and 425 sq yards
Regularisation Date
May 23, 2023
Regularisation Rates
₹2,500 and ₹350 per square yard
Prevailing Card Rate
₹60,300 per square yard
Next Hearing Date
January 7, 2026
Petitioner
Gadeela Raghuveer Reddy
Government Representatives
Additional Advocate-General Md Imran Khan

Timeline

  1. Telangana eyes temple land sales for funds, revealing plans for upgrades and tourism boost.

  2. Then, government moves ahead, aiming to raise cash for temple improvements.

  3. High Court slams government: Land sold cheap to mayor, her brother.

Quotes

The Division Bench of Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice G M Mohiuddin

The judges presiding over the case in the Telangana High Court.

“The department has applied a careful mind to the case of these petitioners. The scheme permits the regularisation of all those who were encroachers as of June 2, 2014. Everyone had land in their possession from different periods of time. Why this deviation in the case of private respondents?”
indianexpress.com
“We are not saying remove them, but charge them at the rate which everyone else has to pay… We only want you to stick to the policy you have framed and not make exceptions to anyone.”
indianexpress.com

Sources

Related news