2 hrs ago

Bombay High Court Upholds Law Officer’s Pension Service Claim

Bombay High Court Upholds Law Officer’s Pension Service Claim
Law officer wins pension fight with Savitribai Phule university in Bombay High Court · indianexpress.com

A university law officer worked there for nearly 29 years.

Her first 13 years were as a law officer.

She later became a senior law officer on a post supported by state funding.

The Maharashtra government said the first 13 years should not count toward her pension.

The officer disagreed and took the issue to the Bombay High Court.

The court said she had worked continuously for the same university.

It also noted that her earlier service had already been recognised for pay and an age-limit relaxation.

The court ruled that refusing to count those years was unfair and arbitrary.

It ordered that the earlier service count toward her pension and stopped any recovery of benefits.

Key facts

Employee
Dr Parveen Parvez Sayyaed
University
Savitribai Phule Pune University
Earlier service
Law officer from June 9, 1997, to July 31, 2010
Total university service
About 29 years
Government’s argument
The earlier post was university-funded rather than state-funded
Court’s ruling
The earlier service must count for pension; recovery and withdrawal of benefits were not permitted

Quotes

Bombay High Court

The bench of Justices G S Kulkarni and Dr Neela Gokhale hearing the pension petition

“The denial of pension to the petitioner (senior law officer) in fact amounts to non-recognition of public service as rendered by the petitioner with the university (Savitribai Phule Pune University) from the year 1997 on the post of law officer and thereafter discharging duties on the post of senior law officer from 1 August, 2010”
indianexpress.com
“it would be wholly unjust if the valuable service rendered by the petitioner exclusively in the service of the university for such a long period is not duly recognised to be counted for the purpose of pension.”
indianexpress.com

Sources

Related news