1 month ago
Court Grants Bail to Law Students
Two law students, Prabal Pratap Singh and Chander Bhan, were arrested for disrupting a Supreme Court hearing, using abusive language, and assaulting security personnel.
A Delhi court granted them bail with conditions, including joining the investigation and maintaining decorum in future proceedings.
The court noted that while their conduct was inappropriate and affected the dignity of the Supreme Court, it did not justify prolonged pre-trial detention.
The defense argued that the students' actions were driven by frustration, while the prosecution emphasized the seriousness of disrupting court proceedings.
The court's decision was based on the principle that bail is the rule and jail the exception in such cases.
Two law students, Prabal Pratap Singh and Chander Bhan, were arrested for disrupting a Supreme Court hearing.
They were accused of using abusive language and assaulting security personnel.
A Delhi court granted them bail with conditions, including joining the investigation and maintaining decorum.
The court noted that their conduct affected the dignity of the Supreme Court but did not justify prolonged pre-trial detention.
The defense argued that the students' actions were driven by frustration, while the prosecution emphasized the seriousness of disrupting court proceedings.
- Who
- Prabal Pratap Singh and Chander Bhan, law students
- What
- Granting of bail to two law students for disrupting a Supreme Court hearing
- Where
- New Delhi
- When
- July 10 (incident), recent (bail hearing)
- Why
- The court found that prolonged pre-trial detention was not justified and that bail is the rule in such cases.
Defense Perspective
Prosecution Perspective
Severity of Conduct
Defense Perspective
The defense argues that the conduct, while inappropriate, does not justify prolonged pre-trial detention and that the students' actions were driven by frustration with the judicial process.
Prosecution Perspective
The prosecution emphasizes the seriousness of disrupting court proceedings and the need to uphold the dignity of the Supreme Court, arguing that such behavior cannot be condoned.
Bail Conditions
Defense Perspective
The defense supports the bail conditions imposed, including the requirement to join the investigation and maintain decorum in future proceedings, as a fair balance between justice and individual rights.
Prosecution Perspective
The prosecution may argue that the bail conditions are insufficient to ensure the students will not repeat their disruptive behavior and that stricter measures are necessary.
Key facts
- Date of Incident
- July 10
- Bail Amount
- ₹25,000 each
- Maximum Punishment
- 2 years
- Court Location
- New Delhi
- Accused Names
- Prabal Pratap Singh, Chander Bhan
Quotes
Judicial Magistrate Ravi
Delhi court magistrate overseeing bail proceedings
“"A litigant, howsoever aggrieved by the outcome of his cause or howsoever unrepresented, does not thereby acquire licence to hurl papers in open court or direct abusive language at the presiding authority, much less at the office of the Chief Justice of India (CJI), an institution that stands as the final guarantor of the very rights and liberties that every citizen."”
deccanchronicle.com
Sources
Related news
Ex-TISS Student Arrested After Court Rejects Bail in Saibaba Case
Mumbai Court Grants Bail to Seven TISS Students, Rejects Two
Anticipatory bail granted to man in dog abuse abduction case
Delhi court denies bail in Hauz Khas club bouncer assault
Supreme Court Raps Shiv Sena Corporator Over Doctors’ Assault
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief To Former TISS Student
UP Scholarship 2026: Eligibility, Deadlines And Application Details
Governor Anandiben Patel Turns Heat on Yogi Adityanath Government
UP Approves Grants for Indian Knowledge Chairs
Family Carries Woman's Body 12 Kms on Pushcart
