18 hrs ago
Delhi Court Convicts Man in 2022 Murder, Citing Child’s Testimony
A Delhi court found Bharat guilty of killing a woman named Aarti in 2022.
Aarti was stabbed several times at her home.
Her six-year-old son told the court that he saw the attack.
He said Bharat asked Aarti to come home before stabbing her when she refused.
The judge said the boy gave a clear and believable account.
The account matched the medical evidence.
CCTV footage reportedly showed Bharat leaving with a knife.
The court also heard that he had bought a knife three days before the killing.
The court will decide his punishment on September 11.
A Delhi court convicted Bharat for murdering 28-year-old Aarti at her home on April 21, 2022.
The court relied heavily on the “vivid and graphic” eyewitness testimony of Aarti’s six-year-old son.
The boy said Bharat told Aarti “ghar chal” before stabbing her multiple times when she refused.
CCTV allegedly showed Bharat fleeing with a knife, while investigators said he ordered it three days earlier.
Bharat was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and relevant Arms Act provisions; sentencing is scheduled for September 11.
- Who
- Bharat was convicted of murdering Aarti, with the prosecution relying partly on testimony from her six-year-old son.
- What
- The court convicted Bharat of murder and offences under relevant Arms Act provisions.
- Where
- The killing occurred at Aarti’s house, and the case was decided by a Delhi court.
- When
- Aarti was killed on April 21, 2022; the judgment was dated August 19, and sentencing is scheduled for September 11.
- Why
- The court found the child’s testimony credible and consistent with medical and electronic evidence, including CCTV footage.
Prosecution and Court Findings
Defence Position
Reliability of the child witness
Prosecution and Court Findings
The court found the child’s testimony untutored, vivid, specific and trustworthy, saying it could independently establish the prosecution’s case.
Defence Position
The defence challenged the prosecution’s case by arguing that Bharat was falsely implicated.
Relationship and motive
Prosecution and Court Findings
The prosecution and court said Bharat had developed a one-sided interest in Aarti, harassed her and her family, made objectionable advances, and chased her.
Defence Position
The defence argued that Bharat was in a live-in relationship with Aarti, an account the court rejected after reviewing the evidence.
Planning and physical evidence
Prosecution and Court Findings
The court cited CCTV footage showing Bharat fleeing with a knife and evidence that he ordered the alleged weapon three days before the killing.
Defence Position
The defence’s broader false-implication claim was rejected; the article does not provide a separate response to the CCTV or knife-purchase evidence.
Key facts
- Victim
- Aarti, aged 28
- Accused
- Bharat
- Incident date
- April 21, 2022
- Cause of death
- A fatal stab wound to the heart, according to the post-mortem report
- Key witness
- Aarti’s six-year-old son
- Conviction
- Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and relevant Arms Act provisions
- Next hearing
- The order on the quantum of sentence is scheduled for September 11
Quotes
Delhi court
The Delhi court that convicted Bharat for Aarti’s murder
“The accused has caused multiple injuries with a sharp-edged weapon, a knife, on the vital parts of the deceased Aarti, which establishes the intention and knowledge of the accused to cause the death of the deceased”
theprint.in
“The testimonies of witnesses and appreciation of evidence show that the prosecution has established its case against the accused beyond a shadow of reasonable doubt…”
theprint.in
Sources
Related news
Two brothers challenge IB staffer murder conviction over sole witness
Delhi court convicts man for tea vendor stabbing over bill
Mumbai Court Acquits Man in Son's Murder Case
Delhi Court Frames Rape, Murder and Robbery Charges
Indian-origin teen charged with murdering mother, brother after ChatGPT searches
Bombay High Court Upholds Life Term in Wife’s Murder
DNA Evidence Did Not Prove Non-Consent, Delhi High Court Rules
Jharkhand High Court Upholds Nine-Year Dowry Death Sentence
Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Young Murder Accused
Supreme Court Quashes 20-Year Conviction, Reaffirms Juvenile Legal Protections
