2 days ago
Orissa High Court Upholds Divorce, Raises Alimony to Rs 25 Lakh
A couple asked the courts to decide whether their marriage should end.
The husband had sought a divorce, saying the relationship had become cruel and difficult.
The wife challenged the divorce and raised concerns about how her allegations were considered.
The Orissa High Court agreed that the divorce should stand.
It pointed to the couple’s long separation, lack of communication and unsuccessful efforts to reconcile.
The court said having different lifestyles or financial backgrounds is not, by itself, cruelty.
It also considered the wife’s qualifications and unemployment, along with the husband’s income, expenses and debts.
The court increased her permanent alimony from Rs 16 lakh to Rs 25 lakh.
The report gives conflicting dates, saying the marriage was in July 2017 but separation began in February 2017.
The Orissa High Court upheld a family court’s divorce decree based on cruelty by the wife.
The court said the couple’s prolonged separation, lack of communication and failed reconciliation efforts supported its decision.
It clarified that differences in financial background or lifestyle alone do not amount to matrimonial cruelty.
The court raised the wife’s permanent alimony from Rs 16 lakh to Rs 25 lakh, considering both parties’ circumstances.
The report says the wife claimed the marriage took place in July 2017, but also says the couple lived separately from February 2017.
- Who
- A wife appealed a family court’s divorce order; the husband had sought the divorce.
- What
- The Orissa High Court upheld the divorce and increased permanent alimony from Rs 16 lakh to Rs 25 lakh.
- Where
- Orissa High Court, India.
- When
- The family court order was issued in May 2022; the High Court order was dated October 1. The year of the High Court order is not stated in the report.
- Why
- The court cited prolonged separation, lack of communication, failed reconciliation efforts and the overall course of the relationship as supporting its finding of mental cruelty.
Wife's appeal
Husband's response
Basis for finding cruelty
Wife's appeal
The wife argued that an allegation about her accustomed lavish lifestyle could not by itself establish matrimonial cruelty, and said her allegations of money demands and physical and mental harassment were not properly considered.
Husband's response
The husband argued that the relationship had become irretrievably strained soon after the marriage and that repeated reconciliation efforts had failed.
Divorce and separation
Wife's appeal
The wife challenged the family court’s divorce order and sought to resume the marriage.
Husband's response
The husband maintained that the couple had lived separately and supported the divorce decree.
Permanent alimony
Wife's appeal
The wife appealed the family court decision, which had set permanent alimony at Rs 16 lakh.
Husband's response
The husband supported the original amount, citing his income and financial circumstances. The High Court later raised the award to Rs 25 lakh.
Key facts
- Court
- Orissa High Court
- Judges
- Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice Chittaranjan Dash
- Appealed order
- Family court order from May 2022
- Original permanent alimony
- Rs 16 lakh
- Revised permanent alimony
- Rs 25 lakh
- Husband's divorce petition
- Filed in 2020, citing cruelty
- Date discrepancy in report
- It says the marriage took place in July 2017 but also says the couple lived separately from February 2017.
Quotes
Orissa High Court
The court’s order in the wife’s appeal.
“Once the course of matrimonial cruelty established against the appellant (wife) is taken into account, it cannot be said that the respondent (husband)’s withdrawal from her society was without reasonable cause.”
indianexpress.com
“The relevance of these circumstances is only in understanding the actual matrimonial dynamics between the parties.”
indianexpress.com









