35 mins ago
Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Mail Voting Restrictions Ahead of Midterms
A judge stopped a new plan that could change how mail-in ballots are delivered.
The plan came from an executive order signed by Donald Trump.
Trump said mail voting could be vulnerable to fraud, but the article says he provided no evidence for that claim.
Several Democratic-led states sued the administration.
They said states, not the federal government, have broad control over elections.
Judge Indira Talwani said the changes might prevent millions of people from voting by mail.
She also said there was not enough time to use the new rules before the November elections.
The administration is expected to ask the Supreme Court to overturn the judge’s decision.
Judge Indira Talwani extended a block on the Postal Service’s planned mail-ballot procedures.
The lawsuit was brought by Democratic-led states arguing that states control election administration.
Talwani said the changes could disenfranchise millions of mail voters and could not be implemented in time.
Donald Trump’s March executive order would require voter lists before the Postal Service delivers ballots.
The Trump administration has appealed the earlier ruling and is expected to appeal the latest order.
- Who
- District Judge Indira Talwani, the Trump administration, the United States Postal Service, and Democratic-led states.
- What
- A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction blocking Postal Service procedures connected to Trump’s mail-voting restrictions.
- Where
- The dispute concerns elections and mail voting in the United States; North Carolina began sending ballots on Friday.
- When
- The latest ruling was issued Friday, ahead of the November midterm elections; Trump signed the executive order in March.
- Why
- The states argued that election administration is broadly controlled by states, while Talwani said the procedures could disenfranchise millions of mail voters.
States and Court Concerns
Trump Administration Position
Who controls election administration
States and Court Concerns
Democratic-led states argue that the Constitution gives states, rather than the federal government, broad control over election administration.
Trump Administration Position
The Trump administration is defending the federal executive order and has appealed the judge’s earlier ruling.
Mail-voting restrictions
States and Court Concerns
Critics and Judge Talwani say the new procedures could restrict ballot distribution and disenfranchise millions of citizens who want to vote by mail.
Trump Administration Position
Donald Trump says mail-in voting is vulnerable to fraud, although the article says he has offered no evidence for that claim.
Key facts
- Ruling
- Judge Indira Talwani issued a preliminary injunction against the Postal Service plan.
- Executive order
- Donald Trump signed the mail-voting order in March.
- Required procedure
- The order would require lists of eligible voters before ballots could be delivered.
- Court concern
- Talwani said the procedures threatened disenfranchisement of millions of mail voters.
- Election timing
- North Carolina began sending mail-in ballots Friday, with other states expected to follow.
- Appeal
- The Trump administration appealed the earlier ruling to the Supreme Court and is expected to appeal the latest order.
- Postal warning
- A United States Postal Service whistleblower warned that millions might not receive ballots because the systems were assembled in a sloppy and rushed manner.
Sources
Related news
Judge Blocks Trump Mail-Voting Plan Ahead of Midterm Elections
Supreme Court Clears Hurdle for Trump's Mail Voting Restrictions
Supreme Court Gives Trump Temporary Win on Mail-Ballot Restrictions
Trump Asks Supreme Court To Lift Mail-In Voting Block
Judge Lifts Block on Trump Mail Restrictions Before Midterms
Supreme Court Clears Path for Trump Mail-In Voting Restrictions
Judge Extends Block on Trump Mail-In Voting Restrictions
