3 weeks ago

AI executives say their machines have started to improve themselves

AI executives say their machines have started to improve themselves
AI bosses are now saying their machines have started improving themselves · wionews.com

Big robot companies have some of the smartest computers in the world.

Lately, the people who run these companies are saying something amazing: their computers are starting to get smarter on their own.

They call this a 'brain explosion' for machines, where each new smart computer helps build an even smarter one.

And they have some real stories to back it up.

One AI solved a super hard math puzzle that people had been stuck on for about 80 years.

Another AI found a hidden mistake in a secret code that experts had missed for two years.

Another AI worked by itself on a computer project for more than two weeks, building its own tools along the way.

But we should be careful before believing everything, because these companies make money when people think their AI is amazing.

In the past, some companies said their AI was better than it really was.

People who study this say the AI is really good at helping humans work faster, but it may not actually be improving itself all alone yet.

Key facts

Core claim
AI systems are in the early stages of an 'intelligence explosion,' contributing to their own development
OpenAI milestone
Unreleased model disproved the Erdős unit distance conjecture, open for roughly 80 years
Anthropic milestone
Claude Mythos Preview found a weakness in HAWK, a post-quantum cryptography candidate, in about 60 hours after it survived ~2 years of expert scrutiny
Alibaba claim
Qwen3.8-Max ran autonomously on a software project for more than 16 consecutive days (vendor-reported, not independently verified)
Anthropic robotics claim
Claude Opus 4.7 reportedly produced robotics programming up to 20 times faster than systems a year earlier
OpenAI IPO
Valuation between $852 billion and $1 trillion; prospectus public this month
Industry AI capex
Tracking toward $740 billion this year from the largest technology companies
Verification concerns
Meta's Llama 4 benchmarks were cherry-picked; Muse Spark 1.1 reported 80.0 vs 69.29 in independent measurement on Terminal-Bench 2.1

Quotes

Unnamed laboratory executive

Executive at a leading AI research lab

“The defensible version of the claim is narrower and still significant: AI systems are now contributing enough to research and engineering work that they measurably compress how long that work takes, including work on AI itself.”
wionews.com
“The people running the world's most advanced AI laboratories have begun saying, with increasing directness, that their systems have started improving themselves.”
wionews.com

Sources

Related news