1 hr ago
Subhash Chandra Settlement Intensifies Scrutiny of Insolvency Fraud Probes
The article looks at whether some companies may be misusing India’s bankruptcy system.
A bankruptcy process is supposed to help creditors recover money when a company cannot pay its debts.
The Directorate of Enforcement says some promoters may secretly use related companies or other people to regain control of their businesses.
It is investigating cases involving allegedly fake bids, diverted money and creditor committees influenced by company promoters.
In the Alchemist case, the National Company Law Tribunal said the insolvency process was affected by fraud and collusion.
In the Sunstar case, investigators said the company may have helped finance its own takeover.
Several cases involved very large reductions in the money recovered by banks.
One resolution professional denied the allegations and said he followed the insolvency law.
The cases have raised questions about whether the system protects creditors effectively.
Subhash Chandra’s Rs 6.5-crore settlement, against admitted claims exceeding Rs 22,000 crore, has renewed concerns about the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
The Directorate of Enforcement has made investigating alleged fraud under the IBC and Prevention of Money Laundering Act a key operational priority.
The agency has investigated nearly a dozen cases involving alleged manipulation of creditor committees, resolution plans, asset sales and insolvency professionals.
Investigations cited in the report include Alchemist, Sunstar Overseas, Richa Industries, Amtek Auto, Bhasin Infotech and several other companies.
In one case, an insolvency professional denied allegations, while tribunals and courts have ordered action or investigations in others.
- Who
- The Directorate of Enforcement, insolvency professionals, company promoters, creditors and tribunals are involved; Subhash Chandra’s settlement prompted renewed scrutiny.
- What
- Authorities are examining alleged fraud and manipulation of insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.
- Where
- The cases concern Indian companies and proceedings before the National Company Law Tribunal, with the conference held in Bengaluru.
- When
- The Directorate of Enforcement discussed the issue at a conference in Bengaluru this week; the cited investigations began between 2016 and 2025.
- Why
- The agency suspects that some promoters and associates used insolvency proceedings to regain assets or control, while creditors suffered substantial haircuts.
Regulatory and Creditor Concerns
Process Defences and Legal Caution
Whether insolvency is being manipulated
Regulatory and Creditor Concerns
The Directorate of Enforcement alleges that promoters, related entities and intermediaries manipulated creditor committees, bids, asset transfers and resolution plans to regain control or divert value.
Process Defences and Legal Caution
Allegations remain subject to investigation and legal proceedings; the report does not establish that every cited insolvency process was unlawfully manipulated.
Effect on creditors
Regulatory and Creditor Concerns
Large haircuts, including roughly 85% in Sunstar Overseas and about 94% in Richa Industries, are presented as evidence of possible losses for banks and other creditors.
Process Defences and Legal Caution
The article does not provide the commercial or legal reasoning behind each haircut, so the recovery figures alone do not prove misconduct.
Role of resolution professionals
Regulatory and Creditor Concerns
The agency has alleged that some resolution professionals failed to act on fraudulent transactions or facilitated plans linked to former promoters.
Process Defences and Legal Caution
Angle Infra’s resolution professional, Sarvesh Kashyap, denied the allegations in full and said he acted within the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code; he also said the matter was sub judice.
Key facts
- Subhash Chandra settlement
- Rs 6.5 crore against admitted claims exceeding Rs 22,000 crore
- Enforcement priority
- The Directorate of Enforcement identified alleged IBC and PMLA fraud as a first operational thrust area.
- Alchemist claims
- The company had an alleged money-laundering case involving more than Rs 1,840 crore.
- Sunstar resolution
- Sunstar Overseas had admitted claims of Rs 1,274.14 crore and was taken over for Rs 196 crore.
- Richa Industries recovery
- Public-sector banks received Rs 40.29 crore against admitted claims of Rs 696 crore.
- Amtek Auto group
- Fifteen group companies had claims exceeding Rs 34,000 crore; lenders recovered about Rs 6,300 crore.
- Bhushan Power and Steel
- The company faced alleged bank fraud of Rs 47,204 crore and was resolved for about Rs 19,350 crore.
Quotes
Sarvesh Kashyap
Resolution professional for Angle Infrastructure
“The matter is sub judice and…it would be inappropriate to comment in detail on the given matter.…During my tenure, I acted strictly within the framework of the IBC, 2016.”
indianexpress.com










