1 hr ago
Supreme Court Dismisses 271 Appeals Over Soldiers’ Disability Pensions
The Supreme Court dismissed 271 government appeals about disability pensions for former soldiers.
The appeals challenged decisions that awarded pensions to ex-servicemen.
The court said the employer must show that a disability was not connected to military service.
It criticized the government for continuing these cases despite a 2015 recommendation to withdraw them.
That report said disabled soldiers were sometimes denied benefits for overly technical reasons.
The court said military service can involve stress and strain.
It also said pension rules should be clear and officially published.
The judges wanted former soldiers to have more confidence in how their claims are handled.
The Supreme Court dismissed 271 Centre appeals challenging disability-pension awards to ex-servicemen.
The court said employers must prove a disability was not attributable to military service.
It criticized the government for not implementing a 2015 recommendation to withdraw similar appeals.
The bench said disabled soldiers had been denied benefits on hyper-technical grounds.
It urged authorities to clearly and authoritatively notify applicable pension rules and regulations.
- Who
- The Supreme Court, the Centre, and ex-servicemen, including disabled soldiers.
- What
- The court dismissed 271 appeals against orders granting disability pensions and clarified the employer’s burden of proof.
- Where
- The verdict was delivered by the Supreme Court in New Delhi.
- When
- The verdict was delivered on September 15; the year is not specified in the article.
- Why
- The court found that the appeals concerned disability-pension entitlement and criticized the continued litigation despite a 2015 recommendation to withdraw such cases.
Supreme Court’s position
Centre’s position
Continuation of appeals
Supreme Court’s position
The court criticized the continued filing of appeals against disabled soldiers despite the 2015 recommendation to withdraw such litigation.
Centre’s position
The Centre filed the appeals challenging orders from the Armed Forces Tribunal and various high courts that granted disability-pension benefits.
Disability-pension eligibility
Supreme Court’s position
The court held that the employer bears the onus of proving that a service member’s disability was not attributable to military service.
Centre’s position
The Centre’s appeals contested the entitlement decisions, although the article does not state a separate detailed argument from the government.
Pension rules
Supreme Court’s position
The court said rules governing pension benefits should be transparent, clear, certain, and authoritatively notified.
Centre’s position
The article does not report a specific Centre response on the court’s call for clearer rules.
Key facts
- Appeals dismissed
- 271 appeals filed by the Centre
- Beneficiaries
- Ex-servicemen seeking the disability component of service pension
- Burden of proof
- The employer must prove that a disability was not attributable to military service
- Relevant report
- The 2015 Raksha Mantri Report on service and pension matters and dispute reduction
- Report recommendation
- Immediate withdrawal of appeals against disabled soldiers
- Supreme Court bench
- Justice P.S. Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe
- Court direction
- Applicable pension rules and regulations should be clearly and authoritatively notified
Quotes
Supreme Court
The two-judge Supreme Court bench hearing the disability pension appeals.
“We are at a loss to understand why the position of a rule governing pensionary benefits should be shrouded in mystery. Transparency, clarity and certainty are of enormous importance for any legitimate action.”
deccanchronicle.com
“The Raksha Mantri Report recommended the immediate withdrawal of appeals of this nature pending against disabled soldiers, a recommendation that has not been faithfully implemented.”
deccanchronicle.com
Sources
Related news
Supreme Court Rejects Centre Appeals on Armed Forces Disability Pensions
Supreme Court Gives Centre One Week for Judges’ Benefits Panel
Supreme Court Stays Reinstatement in IAS Dog-Walk Row
Madhya Pradesh High Court Restores Government Employee’s Pension
Supreme Court Protects Pension After Invalidating ST Certificate
Punjab Court Imposes Fresh Cost Over 25-Year Pension Delay
Supreme Court Rejects Plea for Fraud-Proof Medical Degree Verification
Supreme Court Tightens Vehicle Repossession Rules, Penalizes Financier
Supreme Court Upholds NCTE Teacher Appraisal Notice
Supreme Court Declines PIL Against Rajasthan, UP School Curbs
