1 week ago
Supreme Court Grants YouTuber Abhishek Upadhyay Interim Relief
The Supreme Court is considering a case involving YouTuber Abhishek Upadhyay.
The case relates to a road-rage FIR in Ghaziabad.
The court said that no coercive action should be taken against him for now.
This protection will continue until the court gives further orders.
Upadhyay told the court that he feared being arrested.
He also said he feared being physically harmed.
His plea said he could not safely travel to the Allahabad High Court.
The plea alleged that people connected to the state machinery might harm him.
The Supreme Court granted relief to YouTuber Abhishek Upadhyay in a Ghaziabad road-rage FIR.
It ordered that no coercive action be taken against him until further orders.
Upadhyay’s plea said he feared imminent arrest and further physical harm.
He said he could not safely approach the Allahabad High Court for protection.
The plea alleged that state machinery in Uttar Pradesh could use planted goons against him.
- Who
- The Supreme Court and YouTuber Abhishek Upadhyay.
- What
- The court granted relief and ordered no coercive action against Upadhyay until further orders in a Ghaziabad road-rage FIR.
- Where
- Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh; the plea also refers to the Allahabad High Court.
- When
- Until further orders; the articles do not provide the order’s date.
- Why
- Upadhyay said he feared imminent arrest and physical harm and could not safely approach the Allahabad High Court.
Key facts
- Person
- Abhishek Upadhyay
- Case
- Ghaziabad road-rage FIR
- Court action
- No coercive action until further orders
- Fear stated in plea
- Imminent arrest and further physical harm
- High Court mentioned
- Allahabad High Court
- State mentioned
- Uttar Pradesh
Quotes
The petitioner
The individual who filed the plea seeking judicial protection.
“The Petitioner apprehends imminent arrest and further physical harm and states that, in view of the aforesaid sequence, he is not in a position to safely approach the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad.”
timesnownews.com
“He apprehends that he may be arrested or subjected to physical harm by planted goons of the state machinery in the State of Uttar Pradesh before he can obtain effective judicial protection.”
timesnownews.com
Sources
Related news
Supreme Court Protects YouTuber Reporting Ram Mandir Donation Allegations
Supreme Court to Hear Abhishek Upadhyay’s Ghaziabad FIR Plea
Supreme Court Protects Journalist in Ghaziabad Road-Rage Case
Journalist Faces Ghaziabad Road-Rage FIR, Calls Case Planted
Supreme Court Shields Journalist Challenging Ghaziabad Road Rage FIR
Supreme Court to Hear YouTuber’s Challenge to Road-Rage FIR
Road Cave-Ins Injure Two in Lucknow and Alarm Kanpur Residents
India’s GDP Paradox: Strong Growth, Uneven Economic Reality
Gold Loans Quadruple as India’s Untapped Gold Wealth Fuels Growth
Mirzapur: The Movie Sells Over One Lakh Advance Tickets
Uttar Pradesh Floods Worsen as Evacuations and Relief Expand
