22 hrs ago
Trump DOJ threatens states’ welfare aid over migrant reporting
The Justice Department wants states to tell federal immigration officials about people who are in the United States without legal status.
This rule would apply to information held by many state agencies, not just welfare offices.
Universities and motor vehicle departments could have information that the federal government wants reported.
The government says states could lose welfare money if they do not follow the rule.
The money comes from two programs called Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and Supplemental Security Income.
People without legal status are not eligible for these programs.
Some states, especially Democratic-led states, may sue to stop the broader information-sharing requirement.
Courts have already blocked or limited some similar efforts by the administration.
The Justice Department says states receiving two federal welfare programs must report unlawfully present immigrants known to state agencies.
States that fail to comply could lose funding, according to the department’s legal opinion.
The expanded interpretation could include agencies such as universities and motor vehicle departments, not only welfare administrators.
The programs provide more than $16.5 billion in annual Temporary Assistance for Needy Families grants and over $60 billion in Supplemental Security Income benefits.
Democratic-led states may challenge the policy, while courts have previously limited some federal demands for immigration-related data.
- Who
- The U.S. Justice Department, state governments, and the Department of Homeland Security are central to the dispute.
- What
- The Justice Department issued an opinion requiring states receiving funding from two welfare programs to report unlawfully present immigrants known to state agencies.
- Where
- The policy applies to all 50 states, Washington, D.C., and many U.S. territories.
- When
- The opinion was released on Wednesday, September 2; the report says the policy follows President Donald Trump’s return to office in January 2025.
- Why
- The Justice Department says a broader reading of a 1996 federal law requires every state agency, rather than only welfare administrators, to share such information.
Administration position
State challengers’ concerns
Scope of reporting
Administration position
The Justice Department says every state agency must report unlawfully present immigrants known to it, arguing that an earlier rule improperly narrowed federal law.
State challengers’ concerns
States could object that the broader requirement reaches agencies such as universities and motor vehicle departments and expands information sharing beyond welfare administrators.
Funding leverage
Administration position
The administration says noncompliance may justify serious consequences, including the loss of federal welfare funding.
State challengers’ concerns
Democratic-led states have already sued over access to personal information and may challenge the threat to withhold funding.
Federal immigration enforcement
Administration position
The administration has pursued greater cooperation with state and local authorities as part of its immigration crackdown.
State challengers’ concerns
Courts have limited some administration efforts to require states to share immigration-related information, although some data-sharing requests have been allowed.
Key facts
- Potential consequence
- States that do not comply may lose federal program funding.
- Programs affected
- Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and Supplemental Security Income.
- Annual TANF funding
- Federal grants exceed $16.5 billion.
- Annual SSI funding
- Federal benefits exceed $60 billion.
- Legal status of opinion
- The opinion is not law but is binding on federal agencies.
- Earlier reporting rule
- A 1998 rule limited the meaning of “State” to the specific agencies administering the programs.
- Possible legal response
- Democratic states may challenge the policy in court.
Quotes
Joshua Craddock
Deputy Assistant Attorney General who signed the Justice Department legal opinion
“Failure to comply may lead to serious consequences, including loss of program funding.”
theprint.in









