1 day ago

Collegium Recommends Four High Court Chief Justices Amid Rajasthan Row

Collegium Recommends Four High Court Chief Justices Amid Rajasthan Row
Amid row over Rajasthan Acting CJ, SC Collegium recommends Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal as Chief Justice · thestatesman.com

The Supreme Court Collegium is a group that recommends judges for important court jobs.

On August 31, 2026, it suggested new Chief Justices for four High Courts.

Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal was suggested for the Rajasthan High Court.

Justice Alpesh Yeshvant Kogje was suggested for the Madhya Pradesh High Court.

Justice Dr Pushpendra Singh Bhati was suggested for the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court.

Justice Krushna Ram Mohapatra was suggested for the Chhattisgarh High Court.

These suggestions are connected partly to concerns about how the Rajasthan High Court was being run.

A Supreme Court judge had made allegations about the acting Chief Justice, but the Chief Justice of India said the claims must be examined through proper institutional procedures.

The Centre will now process the recommendations, so the appointments are not final yet.

Key facts

Collegium meeting
August 31, 2026
Rajasthan High Court
Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal recommended as Chief Justice
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Justice Alpesh Yeshvant Kogje recommended as Chief Justice
Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
Justice Dr Pushpendra Singh Bhati recommended as Chief Justice
Chhattisgarh High Court
Justice Krushna Ram Mohapatra recommended as Chief Justice
Chhattisgarh retirement date
The incumbent Chief Justice is due to retire on September 4, 2026
Next step
The Centre will process the recommendations under the existing memorandum of procedure

Quotes

Supreme Court Collegium

The Supreme Court body that recommends appointments and transfers of High Court judges

“The Supreme Court Collegium, in its meeting held on 31st August, 2026, has recommended elevation of Judges as Chief Justices of the High Courts, as mentioned below,”
thehansindia.com
“The fact that allegations have been made, therefore, cannot by itself be treated as a finding against the judge.”
thehansindia.com

Sources

Related news