2 weeks ago

Advocates Welcome Supreme Court Rebuke Over Consumer Fora Delays

Advocates Welcome Supreme Court Rebuke Over Consumer Fora Delays
Mumbai: Advocates Welcome Supreme Court’s Rebuke To Consumer Fora Over Delayed Justice · freepressjournal.in

Consumer courts in India help people who have been treated unfairly by companies.

India's Supreme Court is the highest court in the country.

It recently told these consumer courts that they are taking too long to give justice.

Lawyers who work in these courts said the Supreme Court was right.

There is an old man named Arvind Budhkar in this story.

He left his home so that a new building could be built for his society.

The builder was supposed to finish the building in three years.

Almost 17 years later, the building is still not done.

Mr. Budhkar won a case in 2019, but the builder appealed.

Now he waits again, this time for a decision in September.

Key facts

Event
Supreme Court rebukes consumer fora over delayed justice
Date
August 14, 2026
Location
Mumbai and Tilak Nagar, Kalyan, India
Example case
Arvind Budhkar (72) and 23 other members of Shankar Chhaya Co-operative Housing Society
Developer
Shruti Raj Enterprise
Development agreement
October 23, 2007; 15-storey building due within 3 years of members vacating
Project status
11 of 15 floors completed after nearly 17 years; no construction activity for 3 years
Next hearing
Final disposal scheduled before the NCDRC in September

Quotes

Ali Kaashif Khan Deshmukh

Advocate and critic of consumer forum practices

“"We won the case against the developer before the State Consumer Commission in 2019, and we were hopeful about our house, but the judgment was challenged before the National Commission by the developer and the case is just lying before the Commission since then. However, we have got a date this September for its final disposal. Hopefully, we shall get the judgment. The entire process of seeking justice is very much frustrating."”
freepressjournal.in
“"This also leads to mishandling of judicial matters, which thus results in order copies which lack judicial application of minds. Senior advocates practising before the Commission often feel that it is an insult to human intelligence while appearing before a few of these non‑judicial members."”
freepressjournal.in

Sources

Related news