2 hrs ago
Palghar Court Sentences Man 20 Years For Assaulting Minor Boy
A court in Palghar found Madhu Dharma Govari guilty of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old boy.
The prosecution said the boy was taken to a terrace and attacked on December 12, 2020.
The boy later escaped and told his maternal aunt.
The court said the boy’s testimony was believable.
Forensic evidence also connected Govari to the victim’s clothing.
The court rejected the argument that people nearby would have prevented the assault.
It said that people sometimes fail to help or notice crimes in crowded places.
Govari must serve 20 years in prison, pay a fine, and the victim can receive compensation.
A Palghar court sentenced Madhu Dharma Govari to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment.
The court convicted Govari under the POCSO Act and Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution said the 14-year-old victim was assaulted on December 12, 2020.
The court relied on the victim’s testimony, circumstantial evidence and forensic evidence, including semen stains.
Govari was fined Rs 30,000, while further victim compensation was directed through the District Legal Services Authority, Thane.
- Who
- Madhu Dharma Govari, a 41-year-old labourer from Vasai, was convicted; the victim was a 14-year-old boy.
- What
- Govari was sentenced to 20 years’ rigorous imprisonment for sexually assaulting the minor.
- Where
- The incident occurred on a terrace near the victim’s residence in Vasai, Palghar district, Maharashtra.
- When
- The assault was alleged to have occurred on December 12, 2020.
- Why
- The court found the victim’s credible testimony was corroborated by circumstantial and forensic evidence.
Court’s Findings
Defence Position
Whether the assault was possible in a crowded area
Court’s Findings
The court said bystander apathy is common and that the presence of other people did not discredit the victim’s account.
Defence Position
The defence argued that an assault was improbable in a dense, crowded neighbourhood.
Strength of the prosecution case
Court’s Findings
The court found the victim’s testimony credible and supported by circumstantial and forensic evidence.
Defence Position
The defence challenged the prosecution case through arguments about improbability, alibi and investigative shortcomings.
Key facts
- Accused
- Madhu Dharma Govari, aged 41
- Victim
- A 14-year-old boy at the time of the incident
- Sentence
- 20 years’ rigorous imprisonment under the POCSO Act
- Additional sentence
- 10 years under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, to run concurrently
- Fine
- Rs 30,000, directed for the victim’s rehabilitation
- Evidence
- The court cited the victim’s testimony, circumstantial evidence and semen stains matching the accused to the victim’s clothing
- Further compensation
- The District Legal Services Authority, Thane, was directed to award compensation under applicable rules









