2 hrs ago
Three Tamil Nadu Officers Questioned Over Veeramani POCSO Closure
Police are questioning three officers who worked on an earlier case involving businessman R Veeramani.
The case concerned allegations of child sexual abuse under the POCSO law.
The earlier police team recommended closing the case.
A court did not accept that recommendation and ordered a new investigation.
Veeramani and several other people have since been arrested in connection with the allegations.
The new investigation is also examining why the first case was closed.
Being questioned does not prove that the three officers did anything wrong.
The allegations against all the arrested people still have to be examined in court.
The Central Crime Branch summoned Assistant Commissioner Yasmin and inspectors Mahesh Kumar and Rajalakshmi over the earlier closure recommendation.
The officers are expected to explain how the complaint was assessed, what evidence was collected and why a closure report was submitted.
A court rejected the initial conclusion and ordered a fresh investigation into allegations against Gem Granites businessman R Veeramani.
Veeramani, along with Shanthi, Mahendra Simhan and former aide Ganesan, has been arrested in connection with allegations involving child sexual abuse.
Claims that the alleged abuse began in 2003 and continued for about 23 years remain unproven allegations under investigation.
- Who
- The Central Crime Branch, three previously involved police officers, R Veeramani and other arrested individuals are connected to the case.
- What
- The Central Crime Branch summoned three officers to question the earlier closure of a POCSO case against Veeramani.
- Where
- The case is being investigated in Chennai, and Veeramani was lodged in Puzhal prison.
- When
- The complaint was registered in October 2025; the article does not specify when the summons were issued.
- Why
- A court rejected the earlier closure conclusion and directed police to conduct a fresh investigation.
Earlier Closure Recommendation
Court-Ordered Fresh Investigation
Whether the case should be closed
Earlier Closure Recommendation
The earlier police team submitted a closure report after assessing the complaint and available evidence.
Court-Ordered Fresh Investigation
The court declined to accept the closure conclusion and directed police to investigate the matter again.
Review of the original investigation
Earlier Closure Recommendation
The article does not state why the officers recommended closure or whether they believed the evidence was insufficient.
Court-Ordered Fresh Investigation
The Central Crime Branch is examining whether material evidence or relevant leads were overlooked and whether there were grounds for the original recommendation.
Key facts
- Investigating agency
- Central Crime Branch
- Summoned officers
- Assistant Commissioner Yasmin and inspectors Mahesh Kumar and Rajalakshmi
- Accused businessman
- R Veeramani of Gem Granites
- Complaint date
- October 2025
- Court action
- Rejected the closure conclusion and ordered a fresh investigation
- Other arrested individuals
- Shanthi, Mahendra Simhan and former aide Ganesan
- Alleged duration
- Claims concern a period beginning as early as 2003 and lasting about 23 years; these claims remain under investigation





