2 hrs ago
TMC Leader Questions CEC Gyanesh Kumar’s Voter-Registration History
Saket Gokhale questioned whether Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar appeared in older voter lists.
He said Kumar was born in Uttar Pradesh, worked in Kerala, and had postings in Delhi.
Gokhale searched voter records from those three places for the 2002-03 review.
He said he could not find Kumar’s name in any of them.
Kumar is listed on the current Delhi voter roll, according to Gokhale.
Gokhale said this difference may normally lead to a notice asking for an explanation.
He asked the Election Commission to clarify Kumar’s voter-registration history.
The Election Commission had not immediately responded.
TMC leader Saket Gokhale claimed CEC Gyanesh Kumar was absent from previous SIR rolls in Uttar Pradesh, Kerala and Delhi.
Gokhale said Kumar is listed on Delhi’s current electoral roll as Gyanesh Kumar, son of Subodh Kumar.
He asked the Election Commission to clarify where Kumar was registered during the 2002-03 Special Intensive Revision.
Gokhale argued Kumar’s absence from earlier rolls should have triggered a “logical discrepancy” notice.
The Election Commission and Gyanesh Kumar had not immediately responded, amid ongoing notices to Delhi voters over SIR discrepancies.
- Who
- Trinamool Congress leader Saket Gokhale questioned Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s voter-registration records.
- What
- Gokhale claimed Kumar’s name was absent from previous Special Intensive Revision rolls but appeared on the current Delhi electoral roll.
- Where
- The records discussed concerned Uttar Pradesh, Kerala and Delhi.
- When
- The claim was reported on September 21, amid the ongoing Special Intensive Revision; the earlier rolls referenced were from 2002-03.
- Why
- Gokhale sought clarification about how Kumar was mapped to the current voter roll and whether he received a notice for an alleged discrepancy.
Gokhale’s Allegation
Official Response Pending
Earlier voter-roll mapping
Gokhale’s Allegation
Gokhale claimed Kumar could not be found in the last SIR rolls for Uttar Pradesh, Kerala or Delhi and therefore should have been flagged for a logical discrepancy.
Official Response Pending
The Election Commission had not immediately responded to the claim or clarified which earlier SIR record, if any, mapped Kumar to the current voter roll.
Need for clarification
Gokhale’s Allegation
Gokhale asked whether Kumar was a registered voter during the 2002-03 revision and whether he received a notice as an unmapped voter.
Official Response Pending
No official position addressing these questions was available in the report.
Key facts
- Person questioned
- Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar
- Person making claim
- Trinamool Congress leader Saket Gokhale
- Current listing cited
- Delhi electoral roll, under the name Gyanesh Kumar, son of Subodh Kumar
- Earlier records searched
- Special Intensive Revision rolls for Uttar Pradesh, Kerala and Delhi from 2002-03
- Delhi draft roll
- More than 97 lakh voters
- Notices issued
- 33.13 lakh voters were issued notices over discrepancies in enumeration details
- Official response
- No immediate response was available from the Election Commission or Gyanesh Kumar
Quotes
Saket Gokhale
Trinamool Congress leader and former Rajya Sabha MP
“If a person cannot be mapped to the last SIR in 2002/2003, they are flagged as a ‘logical discrepancy’ & receive a notice. Now, Gyanesh Kumar was born in UP, is a Kerala cadre IAS officer, and has done postings in Delhi.”
theprint.in
“So I searched for ‘Gyanesh Kumar, son of Subodh Kumar’ in the last SIR for these 3 states. Shockingly, in all 3 states, there is NOBODY registered as Gyanesh Kumar, son of Subodh Kumar in the last SIR.”
theprint.in








