1 hr ago
Gauhati High Court Upholds Talaq-E-Hassan, Requires Registration Under Assam Law
The Gauhati High Court considered a Muslim divorce called Talaq-E-Hassan.
In this process, the husband says “talaq” once a month for three months.
The court said this form of divorce is valid and is not prohibited in India.
The husband in this case made the three pronouncements on March 22, April 26 and May 27, 2026.
He wanted the divorce officially registered.
The court said he must apply under Assam’s 2024 registration law because the older 1935 law is no longer in force.
Officials must check whether he made the pronouncements and confirm his identity.
The wife can still challenge the divorce in an appropriate forum.
The Gauhati High Court held that Talaq-E-Hassan is a valid form of divorce not prohibited in India.
The petitioner pronounced Talaq-E-Hassan on March 22, April 26 and May 27, 2026.
The court directed him to seek registration from the Barpeta jurisdictional Marriage and Divorce Registrar under Assam’s 2024 law.
The earlier 1935 legislation had been repealed, and the authority created under it could no longer register the divorce.
The wife may challenge the divorce, while any registration refusal can be appealed under Section 17 of the 2024 Act.
- Who
- The Gauhati High Court, Justice Arun Dev Choudhury, a husband who sought registration, and his wife were involved.
- What
- The court ruled that Talaq-E-Hassan is a valid form of divorce and directed the petitioner to seek registration under Assam’s 2024 law.
- Where
- The matter concerned Barpeta, Assam, and was heard by the Gauhati High Court.
- When
- The divorce pronouncements were made on March 22, April 26 and May 27, 2026; Justice Arun Dev Choudhury issued the order on a Tuesday before the report dated September 11.
- Why
- The petitioner sought registration of his divorce, but the previous 1935 registration law had been repealed and its authority abolished.
Petitioner’s Position
State and Procedural Position
Validity of Talaq-E-Hassan
Petitioner’s Position
The petitioner argued that Talaq-E-Hassan was not prohibited and had been pronounced according to its requirements.
State and Procedural Position
The court accepted that the form of divorce was valid and not prohibited in India, while the state’s submission focused on the registration authority’s lack of power under the repealed 1935 law.
Where the divorce should be registered
Petitioner’s Position
The petitioner sought registration through the previously applicable authority.
State and Procedural Position
The state said the 1935 legislation had been repealed and the authority appointed under it could no longer register the divorce; the court directed the petitioner to use the registrar under the 2024 Act.
Opportunity to contest
Petitioner’s Position
The petitioner sought recognition of the divorce after making the three pronouncements.
State and Procedural Position
The wife did not appear despite receiving notices, but the court expressly preserved her right to challenge the Talaq-E-Hassan before an appropriate forum.
Key facts
- Court
- Gauhati High Court
- Judge
- Justice Arun Dev Choudhury
- Divorce form
- Talaq-E-Hassan
- Registration law
- Assam Compulsory Registration of Muslim Marriages and Divorce Act, 2024
- Earlier law
- The 1935 legislation had been repealed.
- Registration authority
- Barpeta jurisdictional Marriage and Divorce Registrar
- Appeal provision
- Section 17 of the 2024 Act
- Verification requirement
- The registrar must examine whether the divorce was effected by the petitioner and verify his identity.
Sources
Related news
Chhattisgarh High Court Rejects Religious Court’s Divorce Declaration
Telangana High Court Upholds WhatsApp Divorce Notice Against Dubai-Based Man
Gauhati High Court Orders Assam Compensation for Deportation
Gauhati High Court Questions Assam House Demolitions After Brief Notice
Gauhati High Court Orders Compensation After Woman’s Deportation
