8 months ago
Nemo Returns Eurovision Trophy Over Israel Participation
Nemo, who won the Eurovision Song Contest for Switzerland this year, is giving back their trophy.
They are doing this because they don't agree with Israel being allowed to participate in the contest.
Nemo says that Israel's involvement goes against the contest's values of unity and inclusion, especially because of the war in Gaza.
The United Nations has said that what is happening in Gaza might be a genocide.
Several other countries, like Iceland, Spain, and the Netherlands, have also decided not to participate in the next Eurovision because of this issue.
Nemo wants the organizers to show that they really believe in the values they say are important.
They think the contest should not be used to make a country look better if it is doing things that are not right.
The organizers say that the contest is not political and that they made their decision after a respectful discussion.
Swiss Eurovision winner Nemo is returning their trophy to protest Israel's participation in the contest.
Nemo cites a conflict between Eurovision's ideals of inclusion and Israel's actions in the Gaza war, which the UN has described as a potential genocide.
Five countries have pulled out of the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest over Israel's participation.
Nemo criticizes the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) for allowing Israel to participate while claiming the contest is non-political.
Nemo's protest is part of a broader movement questioning the EBU's stance on political issues, with the EBU defending its decision as respectful and well-considered.
- Who
- Nemo, the Swiss Eurovision winner, and several countries protesting Israel's participation
- What
- Nemo is returning their Eurovision trophy in protest
- Where
- Zurich, Switzerland, with the trophy being sent to EBU headquarters in Geneva
- When
- December 11, 2024
- Why
- To protest Israel's participation in Eurovision amid the Gaza war, citing a conflict with the contest's ideals of inclusion and dignity
Protesters
EBU
Israel's Participation
Protesters
Israel's participation in Eurovision is inappropriate given the ongoing war in Gaza, which the UN has described as a potential genocide. It conflicts with the contest's values of unity and inclusion.
EBU
The EBU maintains that the Eurovision Song Contest is a non-political event and that the decision to allow Israel to participate was made after a respectful and articulate debate among members.
Key facts
- Winner
- Nemo (Swiss Eurovision winner 2024)
- Song
- The Code
- Contest Organizer
- European Broadcasting Union (EBU)
- Countries Pulling Out
- Iceland, Spain, Netherlands, Ireland, Slovenia
- Reason for Protest
- Israel's participation in Eurovision amid Gaza war
- EBU Headquarters
- Geneva, Switzerland
- Estimated Eurovision Viewership
- 160 million viewers
- UN's Stance
- UN's Independent International Commission of Inquiry has concluded that the situation in Gaza may amount to a genocide
Quotes
Nemo
2024 Eurovision Song Contest winner and Swiss singer
“Eurovision says it stands for unity, inclusion, and dignity for all. Those values made this contest meaningful to me. But Israel's continued participation, during what the UN's Independent International Commission of Inquiry has concluded to be a genocide, shows a clear conflict between those ideals and the decisions made by the EBU.”
telegraphindia.com
“The contest was repeatedly used to soften the image of a state accused of severe wrongdoing, all while the EBU insisted Eurovision is 'non-political'.”
telegraphindia.com
European Broadcasting Union (EBU)
Organizer of the Eurovision Song Contest
“In the wake of the recent General Assembly discussion on the Eurovision Song Contest, several EBU Members have been criticised for the position they took in the debate. While public service media is always open to criticism and critique, the EBU feels that some of the attacks on our Members — on both sides of the argument — have been completely inaccurate and ill-informed. The debate on the Eurovision Song Contest was respectful and articulate. Members expressing their opinions were reflecting their own and their audience's views on this difficult issue, not those of any political perspective or political party.”
telegraphindia.com




