7 months ago

Magh Bihu Fishing in Kaziranga Despite High Court Ban

Magh Bihu Fishing in Kaziranga Despite High Court Ban
Kaziranga fishing during Magh Bihu exposes lax enforcement despite High Court ban · assamtribune.com

During the Magh Bihu festival, people went fishing in Kaziranga National Park, even though the High Court had banned it.

The government didn't stop them, and many fish were caught and sold in markets.

Some people say fishing for a short time for the festival is okay, but others want a complete ban because it harms the park.

The government is worried about causing trouble with the local people, so they didn't enforce the ban strictly.

The High Court said the park must be protected by law, but the government didn't take strong action.

Key facts

Location
Kaziranga National Park and Tiger Reserve, Assam, India
Event
Community fishing during Magh Bihu
Ban Issuer
Gauhati High Court
Ban Date
Last month (before Jan 18, 2025)
Fishing Duration
Two days (Jan 17-18, 2025)
Key Figures
Rohit Choudhury (environmental activist), Forest officials, State government
Legal Basis
Wildlife Protection Act, 1972; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Article 48A of the Constitution of India

Quotes

Top Forest official

A high-ranking official in the Forest Department who spoke anonymously to The Assam Tribune.

“We need to evolve a holistic approach that can respect the sentiment of the local communities and at the same time ensure that the practice is actually restricted to fishing for feasting purposes only for an hour or two. Regulated fishing for an hour once a year cannot harm the park’s ecology. But under no circumstances should the situation be allowed to be used for commercial fishing. The local communities should be sensitized on fishing only for feasting and they must keep outside elements out of the social custom.”
assamtribune.com
“It is a protected area and no such activity should be allowed here, as it violates forest, wildlife and conservation laws. It is evident that the menace is getting bigger and more complex with fishing for commercial purposes. The government should act firm in the greater interest of Kaziranga.”
assamtribune.com

Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court in its order on a PIL filed by environmental activist Rohit Choudhury.

“In any view of the matter, the protection of such site is necessary or else there would be a violation of Wildlife Protection Act, 1972; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; and breach of various constitutional obligations under Article 48A of the Constitution of India and of international obligations as well.”
assamtribune.com
“We, therefore, deem it necessary to direct that the necessary prohibitory orders must be enforced.”
assamtribune.com

Official source

An unnamed official source within the government.

“The government must treat the matter seriously and step in firmly to curb fishing, particularly done for commercial purposes.”
assamtribune.com

Sources

Related news