2 weeks ago
Telangana HC Orders Fisheries Elections, Overturns Rythu Bandhu Payout Order
The Telangana High Court is a big court in India that makes decisions about the rules people must follow.
In one case, some people asked the court to make sure elections happen for groups called fisheries cooperative societies, which help fishermen and fish sellers work together.
The court told the government to hold these elections and not delay them.
It also said the groups' leaders should be chosen in a fair, democratic way within three weeks.
In another case, the court talked about a program called Rythu Bandhu, which gives money to farmers to help them grow crops.
A few years ago, some farmers wanted the court to make the government give them this money, and an earlier judge agreed.
But the government said it could not pay everyone and only gave money to farmers with smaller farms because there was not enough money during the Covid-19 pandemic.
The High Court's bigger panel of judges said a court cannot force the government to pay money that was not planned in its budget.
So the bigger panel changed the earlier decision, and the government did not have to pay those farmers for that year.
The Telangana High Court directed the state to avoid delays in elections to primary and district-level fisheries cooperative societies and constitute governing bodies democratically within three weeks.
Justice Surepalli Nanda passed the order on a petition by Sadhu Raghu of Mulugu district and others challenging official inaction on their representations.
A division bench set aside a single judge's September 2024 order directing release of Rythu Bandhu investment support to certain farmers in Khammam district for Kharif and Rabi 2019.
The state argued the assistance was a policy decision taken amid Covid-19 financial constraints, limited to farmers holding up to 10 acres for Kharif 2019 and six acres for Rabi 2019.
Officials reportedly denied benefits to 1,41,993 farmers for Kharif 2019 involving ₹850.82 crore and 9,46,009 farmers for Rabi 2019 involving ₹2,132.95 crore.
The division bench held that a writ court could not compel the government to make a payment that was not budgeted for, citing the Supreme Court's guidance on economic and fiscal policy.
The bench said an earlier administrative communication could not be construed as an admission of liability or an assurance to release the assistance.
- Who
- The Telangana High Court, including Justice Surepalli Nanda in the fisheries election case and a division bench of Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice G.M. Mohiuddin in the Rythu Bandhu appeal, along with petitioners such as Sadhu Raghu and the state government.
- What
- The court ordered no delay in elections to fisheries cooperative societies and set aside orders directing payment of Rythu Bandhu support to certain farmers for Kharif and Rabi 2019.
- Where
- Hyderabad, Telangana, at the Telangana High Court.
- When
- The rulings were issued recently; the earlier single-judge Rythu Bandhu order was passed in September 2024.
- Why
- To ensure governing bodies of fisheries societies are constituted democratically without delay, and because the state said the withheld payments followed a policy decision taken amid Covid-19 financial constraints that a writ court could not override for unbudgeted amounts.
Farmers and petitioners
State government
Rythu Bandhu payments for 2019
Farmers and petitioners
Petitioner farmers sought court-ordered release of Rythu Bandhu investment support for Kharif and Rabi 2019, and a single judge directed the government to disburse the amount.
State government
The state said assistance was a policy decision restricted by landholding limits and availability of funds amid Covid-19 financial constraints, so the petitioners, who owned land substantially exceeding the limits, were not entitled to receive the benefit.
Court's role in fiscal policy
Farmers and petitioners
Courts can intervene to enforce what petitioners saw as legitimate entitlements, and the earlier single-judge order directed the payment.
State government
Courts should ordinarily refrain from intervening in economic and fiscal policy decisions unless arbitrary, irrational or contrary to law, and a writ court cannot compel payment of money not budgeted for.
Key facts
- Court
- Telangana High Court
- Fisheries election order
- Dispose of representations and decide within three weeks
- Fisheries case judge
- Justice Surepalli Nanda
- Rythu Bandhu appeal bench
- Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice G.M. Mohiuddin
- Kharif 2019 land limit
- Up to 10 acres
- Rabi 2019 land limit
- Up to 6 acres
- Kharif 2019 assistance denied
- 1,41,993 farmers, ₹850.82 crore
- Rabi 2019 assistance denied
- 9,46,009 farmers, ₹2,132.95 crore
Sources
Related news
Telangana High Court Advances Welfare Appeal, Delays Other Cases
Telangana High Court Clears Way For Jubilee Hills Society Polls
Telangana Urges Faster Bifurcation Settlements, Krishna Water Rights Protection
Courts Halt Society Results, Uphold Insecticide Detention in Telangana
Telangana High Court Lifts Stay on Marriage Assistance Schemes
High Court Concerned Over Delay in UP Panchayat Elections
PUCL Urges CJI Action Over Rajasthan High Court Allegations
Supreme Court Questions IPS Deputation for CAPF Leadership Positions
Supreme Court Quashes 20-Year Conviction, Reaffirms Juvenile Legal Protections
Two Years After RG Kar Doctor's Rape-Murder, Case Remains Unresolved
ED widens Chhattisgarh probes with two arrests and searches
