2 hrs ago

Appeals Court Upholds Pentagon Ban on Anthropic’s AI

Appeals Court Upholds Pentagon Ban on Anthropic’s AI
In Setback For Anthropic, US Court Refuses To Overturn Pentagon Ban · NDTV

Anthropic makes an artificial intelligence system called Claude.

The Pentagon wanted Anthropic to remove some safety rules for using Claude.

These rules covered fully autonomous weapons and mass surveillance of Americans.

Anthropic refused, so the Pentagon labeled the company a supply chain risk.

A federal appeals court voted 2-1 to let the Pentagon keep that label.

This means the military can remove Claude from its systems and limit Anthropic’s defense work.

Anthropic disagrees and may ask for further review.

Another federal court in California had reached a different conclusion about a broader ban.

The disagreement is part of a larger debate about how artificial intelligence should be used by the military.

Key facts

Court ruling
A federal appeals court ruled 2-1 against Anthropic.
Pentagon designation
The Defense Department may continue labeling Anthropic a supply chain risk.
Consequences
The Pentagon can remove Claude from its systems and restrict Anthropic’s defense products.
Contracts
The March designation canceled Anthropic’s military contracts and barred other Pentagon contractors from using its technology.
Anthropic’s safeguards
Anthropic refused to remove restrictions on fully autonomous lethal weapons and mass domestic surveillance of Americans.
Conflicting case
A California federal court recently found a broader Trump administration ban against Anthropic illegal.
Other AI companies
OpenAI, xAI, Google, and Microsoft signed agreements with the Pentagon at different times.

Quotes

Emil Michael

Under Secretary of Defense who commented on the appeals court ruling

“Warfighters will sleep better knowing that no private company will insert their opinions in the chain of command.”
NDTV
“The hammer of justice has smashed Anthropic arguments。”
NDTV

Anthropic spokesperson

An Anthropic representative responding to US media

“We respectfully disagree with the court's decision. Another federal court has already held the government's parallel designation unlawful. We remain confident in our position and are considering all options, including further review,”
NDTV

Sources

Related news