1 hr ago
Bombay High Court Questions Maharashtra Over Pune Land Deal
The case is about a disputed land deal in Mundhwa, Pune.
A court gave Suryakant Yewale protection from arrest before trial.
The court also asked questions about a company involved in the deal.
Parth Pawar is said to own 99 percent of that company.
Digvijay Patil is said to own the remaining 1 percent.
Patil has been made an accused in the case.
The judge asked why the person with most of the shares was not considered responsible or a beneficiary.
The Maharashtra government’s lawyer said the company was not a partnership firm.
The Bombay High Court granted anticipatory bail to suspended Pune City tehsildar Suryakant Yewale.
The case concerns a land transaction in Mundhwa, Pune.
The court noted serious allegations involving Amadea Enterprises LLP.
Parth Pawar reportedly holds 99 percent of the company’s shares, while Digvijay Patil holds 1 percent.
Justice Madhav J. Jamdar questioned whether Parth Pawar benefited from the transaction and why Patil was accused.
- Who
- The Bombay High Court, Suryakant Yewale, Parth Pawar, Digvijay Patil, and Amadea Enterprises LLP are central to the report.
- What
- The court granted Yewale anticipatory bail and questioned the state’s handling of allegations in the Mundhwa land deal case.
- Where
- The case concerns Mundhwa in Pune and was heard by the Bombay High Court.
- When
- Why
- The court questioned why Digvijay Patil, who reportedly owns 1 percent of the company, was accused while Parth Pawar, who reportedly owns 99 percent, was not treated as responsible or a beneficiary.
Court's Questions
State's Position
Responsibility for the transaction
Court's Questions
The judge questioned whether Parth Pawar, who reportedly holds 99 percent of the shares, was a beneficiary or responsible party.
State's Position
The state’s investigating position, as described in the article, treated the 1 percent shareholder Digvijay Patil as the accused and did not identify the 99 percent shareholder as responsible.
Company structure
Court's Questions
The court raised its questions after examining the apparent difference between shareholding and who was accused.
State's Position
The state lawyer said Amadea Enterprises LLP was not a partnership firm.
Key facts
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Case
- Mundhwa land deal case
- Bail decision
- Anticipatory bail granted to suspended Pune City tehsildar Suryakant Yewale
- Company
- Amadea Enterprises LLP
- Shareholding
- Parth Pawar: 99 percent; Digvijay Patil: 1 percent
- Judge
- Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
- Court concern
- Whether the 99 percent shareholder benefited from the transaction
Quotes
Justice Madhav J Jamdar
Bombay High Court judge hearing the Mundhwa land deal case
“Your stand as Investigating Officer (IO) [in the affidavit] is that the person who is having 99 percent shareholding is not responsible, and the one who is accused is the person having 1 percent shareholding. Is the person who is having 99% share, Mr Parth Pawar, not a beneficiary of this transaction?”
indianexpress.com
Sources
Related news
Bombay High Court Seeks Reply In Pune Government Land Case
Sharad Pawar Backs Tata Trusts Amid Leadership, Listing Row
Bombay High Court Discharges Former DSKDL Executive in Fraud Case
Maharashtra Charity Commissioner Clears 1989 Tata Share Transfer
Bhayandar Land Dispute Continues After Developer Relinquishes Property Claim
Singhvi Takes Tata Trusts Dispute Toward Legal Resolution
Minister Expects Stable Kharif Grain Output Despite Weather Risks
Fadnavis hails injured Captain Smit Machchhar as true hero
India’s Southwest Monsoon Ends With 12.6% Rainfall Deficit
Maharashtra Board Waives Exam Fees in 265 Drought-Affected Talukas
