2 days ago
PHQ Orders Fresh Probe Into Bhopal ASI Graft Case
A complaint accused a Bhopal police officer of taking ₹50,000 to protect someone from police action.
The money was allegedly sent through a bank account.
A senior police officer investigated the complaint and gave the accused officer a clean chit.
The accused officer said the money was repayment of a loan, not a bribe.
Police Headquarters was not satisfied with that explanation.
It has asked the Bhopal police commissioner to investigate the matter again.
If that does not happen, the vigilance department may take over the inquiry.
Officials said the case is similar to another alleged bribery case in Indore.
Madhya Pradesh Police Headquarters ordered a fresh investigation into allegations against Bhopal ASI Jagdish Sengar.
The complaint alleged Sengar accepted ₹50,000 through a bank transfer to protect a miscreant from police action.
A DCP-led inquiry cleared Sengar after he said the payment was repayment of a loan.
PHQ officials were dissatisfied with the clean chit and directed the Bhopal commissioner of police to reopen the case.
Officials said the allegations resemble an Indore Lokayukta case in which police personnel allegedly accepted bribes through bank transfers and cash.
- Who
- ASI Jagdish Sengar, the Bhopal Police Commissioner, the Madhya Pradesh Police Headquarters, and a DCP-rank investigating officer are involved.
- What
- Police Headquarters ordered a fresh investigation into allegations that Sengar accepted ₹50,000 in exchange for protecting a miscreant from police action.
- Where
- The main case concerns Ashoka Garden in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh; the comparable case occurred in Indore.
- When
- The articles do not state when the original complaint or PHQ order was issued; a similar Indore case occurred on August 24.
- Why
- PHQ officials were dissatisfied with the DCP-led investigation that cleared Sengar and considered the allegations similar to a recent Indore bribery case.
Initial Inquiry And ASI’s Defense
PHQ’s Call For Fresh Investigation
Whether the payment was a bribe
Initial Inquiry And ASI’s Defense
Sengar said he took back money he had previously loaned to the miscreant, and the DCP-led inquiry accepted this explanation.
PHQ’s Call For Fresh Investigation
The complaint alleged that Sengar received ₹50,000 to shield the miscreant from police action, and the complainant said evidence supported the allegation.
Whether the case was adequately investigated
Initial Inquiry And ASI’s Defense
The DCP-rank officer’s inquiry concluded that Sengar was not guilty of graft and issued a clean chit.
PHQ’s Call For Fresh Investigation
PHQ officials were not satisfied with the outcome and ordered the Bhopal police commissioner to reopen the investigation or face a vigilance department probe.
Relevance of the Indore case
Initial Inquiry And ASI’s Defense
The earlier inquiry treated the payment as a loan repayment rather than established bribery.
PHQ’s Call For Fresh Investigation
PHQ officials said the Bhopal allegations resembled the Indore case, where alleged bribes were collected partly through bank transfer and partly in cash.
Key facts
- Accused officer
- ASI Jagdish Sengar, who was posted at Ashoka Garden
- Alleged bribe
- ₹50,000
- Alleged payment method
- Transfer through a bank account
- Earlier finding
- A DCP-rank officer gave Sengar a clean chit
- New direction
- The Bhopal commissioner of police was asked to reinvestigate the case
- Possible alternative agency
- The PHQ vigilance department may conduct the fresh probe
- Comparable incident
- On August 24 in Indore, the Special Police Establishment Lokayukta caught four police personnel and a private man in an alleged bribery case
Quotes
ASI Jagdish Sengar
Assistant sub-inspector accused of accepting a ₹50,000 payment
“He had taken back the amount he had loaned to the miscreant”
freepressjournal.in











