1 month ago
Delhi HC questions ECI on teacher deployment for election duties
The Delhi High Court is questioning the Election Commission of India (ECI) about its decision to use school teachers for updating voter lists.
The Court wants to know if the ECI has the legal right to do this and if it's fair to teachers.
The ECI says it has the power to do this and that only a few teachers are needed.
But the people who filed a complaint say this is disrupting classes and is unfair because only government school teachers are being asked to do this work.
The Court is concerned that teachers don't have a real choice in doing this work and that it takes away their holidays and teaching time.
Delhi High Court questioned the Election Commission of India (ECI) about deploying teachers for Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.
The Court asked if the ECI has the legal authority to assign such duties under Article 324 of the Constitution.
ECI argued it derives authority from Article 324 and Section 13B(2) of the Representation of the People Act.
Petitioners claimed the deployment disrupts classroom teaching and is discriminatory against government school teachers.
The Court suggested that if the work were truly voluntary, the issue could be resolved.
- Who
- Delhi High Court, Election Commission of India (ECI), Advocates Rajesh Kumar Gogna and Ashok Agarwal.
- What
- Delhi High Court questions the ECI's decision to deploy school teachers for Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.
- Where
- Delhi High Court.
- When
- The hearing took place on Friday.
- Why
- To examine the legal authority and impact of deploying teachers for election-related work.
Election Commission of India (ECI)
Petitioners (Advocates Rajesh Kumar Gogna and Ashok Agarwal)
Authority to Deploy Teachers
Election Commission of India (ECI)
ECI argues it derives authority from Article 324 of the Constitution and Section 13B(2) of the Representation of the People Act.
Petitioners (Advocates Rajesh Kumar Gogna and Ashok Agarwal)
Petitioners argue ECI lacks clear legal authority to deploy teachers and that the deployment violates the Right to Education Act, 2009.
Voluntary Nature of Duty
Election Commission of India (ECI)
ECI claims the work is voluntary and teachers are assigned only during holidays or outside normal teaching hours.
Petitioners (Advocates Rajesh Kumar Gogna and Ashok Agarwal)
Petitioners and the Court argue that teachers do not have the freedom to refuse the assignment, and the work disrupts their holidays and teaching duties.
Impact on Classroom Teaching
Election Commission of India (ECI)
ECI claims only a small percentage of teachers are deployed and the work is managed carefully to avoid unnecessary inconvenience.
Petitioners (Advocates Rajesh Kumar Gogna and Ashok Agarwal)
Petitioners allege that the deployment seriously affects classroom teaching, leading to disruptions and the use of guest teachers or unrelated subject teachers.
Key facts
- Article 324 of the Constitution
- Gives the Election Commission powers to supervise, direct, and control elections to Parliament and State legislatures.
- Section 13B(2) of the Representation of the People Act
- Provides the Election Commission with the authority to deploy personnel for election-related work.
- Right to Education Act, 2009
- Ensures the right to free and compulsory education for children aged 6 to 14 years.
- Section 159 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951
- Allows the deployment of non-teaching government staff for election work.
- Petitioners
- Advocates Rajesh Kumar Gogna and Ashok Agarwal.
Quotes
Delhi High Court Bench
Judges of the Delhi High Court
“"Somebody is not interested in your honorarium or compensation. Can these instructions issued by you be said to be mandatory? Can you say no, no, no, we are compensating, please come. Destroy their holidays? Don’t they need rest?"”
thestatesman.com
“"Can you do whatever you like under Article 324?"”
thestatesman.com








