3 hrs ago
Belgian Federation Withholds Support for Infantino Over FIFA Governance
Belgium’s football federation says it will not support Gianni Infantino for another term as FIFA president.
FIFA is the organization that runs international football.
Belgium says FIFA has not explained some important decisions clearly enough.
One concern involves a plan to sell private-equity stakes in the World Cup.
FIFA withdrew that plan after strong criticism.
Another concern involves Folarin Balogun’s red-card suspension before a match against Belgium.
The suspension was delayed, allowing Balogun to play in that match.
Belgium wants FIFA to explain what happened and make similar decisions clearer in the future.
The Royal Belgian Football Association said it cannot support Gianni Infantino’s bid for another FIFA term.
The federation cited concerns about transparency and governance in FIFA’s handling of the FIFA Forward Enterprise proposal.
FIFA withdrew its proposed $4.2 billion private-equity World Cup stake sale on Aug. 1 after widespread backlash.
Belgium also criticized FIFA’s handling of Folarin Balogun’s deferred one-game suspension before a World Cup match.
The RBFA asked FIFA to discuss the Balogun case at the FIFA Council meeting on Oct. 15.
- Who
- The Royal Belgian Football Association, FIFA President Gianni Infantino, FIFA, and UEFA are involved.
- What
- The Belgian federation withdrew support for Infantino’s reelection and requested explanations about FIFA decisions.
- Where
- The decision concerns FIFA and international football, with the disputed match involving Belgium and the United States.
- When
- The RBFA announced its position on Monday; FIFA’s next Council meeting is scheduled for Oct. 15.
- Why
- The RBFA cited insufficient transparency and explanations in the FIFA Forward Enterprise and Folarin Balogun cases.
Transparency Concerns
FIFA’s Continued Leadership
Support for Infantino
Transparency Concerns
The RBFA said it cannot support Infantino’s reelection, citing unresolved transparency and governance concerns.
FIFA’s Continued Leadership
FIFA said Infantino plans to stand for another term as president, seeking a final term through 2031.
World Cup investment proposal
Transparency Concerns
The RBFA and UEFA questioned the decision-making process surrounding the FIFA Forward Enterprise proposal, which they said lacked adequate justification.
FIFA’s Continued Leadership
FIFA proposed selling World Cup stakes to private equity for $4.2 billion, then withdrew the plan on Aug. 1 after backlash.
Balogun suspension
Transparency Concerns
The RBFA said FIFA had not satisfactorily explained why Balogun’s one-game ban was deferred or how similar cases would be handled.
FIFA’s Continued Leadership
The suspension was deferred, allowing Balogun to play against Belgium, but the article does not provide FIFA’s explanation for that decision.
Key facts
- Belgian federation
- The Royal Belgian Football Association said it cannot support Infantino’s reelection.
- Infantino’s planned term
- FIFA said Infantino plans to seek a final term through 2031.
- FIFA Forward Enterprise proposal
- FIFA proposed selling World Cup stakes to private equity for $4.2 billion.
- Proposal withdrawal
- FIFA withdrew the proposal on Aug. 1 after intense pushback.
- Balogun suspension
- A one-game ban for Folarin Balogun’s red-card tackle was deferred before the match against Belgium.
- Requested FIFA discussion
- The RBFA asked FIFA to place the Balogun case on the Oct. 15 FIFA Council agenda.
Quotes
Royal Belgian Football Association
Belgium’s national football federation
“The RBFA notes that, in this matter, a number of important decisions and assessments have, to date, not been sufficiently substantiated by adequate justifications. This raises questions regarding the transparency and governance of this process. We remain in close contact with UEFA and, together, we are seeking clear answers regarding the decision-making process and the next steps.”
deccanchronicle.com
Pascale Van Damme
President of the Royal Belgian Football Association
“Two months after the events, we note that our questions remain unanswered to date. Given the importance of transparency and clarity for all parties involved, we request the necessary explanations and, at the same time, wish to explore where improvements to the current processes are possible, so that similar cases can be handled in a clear, consistent and efficient manner in the future.”
deccanchronicle.com








