1 week ago
Supreme Court Considers Challenge to Lucknow Lawyers’ Chamber Demolition
Some lawyers have chambers near the Lucknow District Court.
The Allahabad High Court said these structures may have been built on public land or pathways.
It ordered notices to be sent to 72 people accused of encroachment.
They must either leave or prove they have a legal right to the land.
If they cannot do that, the structures may be demolished.
The lawyers’ representative said some chambers have been there for about 40 years.
The Supreme Court will consider whether to list the lawyers’ challenge.
It has not yet announced when it will hear the case.
The Supreme Court agreed to consider listing a plea challenging demolition of lawyers’ chambers near the Lucknow District Court complex.
The Allahabad High Court said 72 alleged encroachers must vacate the structures or establish lawful rights over the land and constructions.
The Lucknow Municipal Corporation issued demolition notices, with action reportedly scheduled for August 30.
The lawyers’ counsel said some chambers have existed for around 40 years and argued the demolition directions came from the high court.
The Supreme Court did not set a hearing date and said the lawyers could file replies to the demolition notices.
- Who
- Lawyers with chambers near the Lucknow District Court, the Allahabad High Court, the Lucknow Municipal Corporation, and the Supreme Court.
- What
- A plea challenges the proposed demolition of lawyers’ chambers allegedly built through encroachment on public land.
- Where
- Near the Lucknow District Court complex in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh; the plea was taken up by the Supreme Court in New Delhi.
- When
- The Supreme Court matter was reported on August 24; the Allahabad High Court issued its directions on August 6, and demolition action was scheduled for August 30.
- Why
- The structures are alleged to occupy public pathways or public utility land, while the lawyers challenge the demolition and say some chambers have existed for around 40 years.
Lawyers’ position
Authorities’ position
Legality and history of chambers
Lawyers’ position
The lawyers’ counsel said the chambers have existed for around 40 years and challenged the demolition directions.
Authorities’ position
The chambers and other structures are alleged to have been built by encroaching on public pathways or public utility land.
Demolition process
Lawyers’ position
The counsel said the demolition notices were issued with the intention of proceeding with demolition and sought Supreme Court intervention.
Authorities’ position
The Allahabad High Court directed the Lucknow Municipal Corporation to allow alleged encroachers to vacate or prove their lawful rights, followed by demolition if they failed.
Key facts
- Structures involved
- Lawyers’ chambers and other structures near the Lucknow District Court complex
- Number of alleged encroachers
- 72
- Authority issuing notices
- Lucknow Municipal Corporation
- Allahabad High Court direction
- Alleged encroachers must vacate or establish lawful rights over the land and constructions
- Possible consequence
- Demolition if the occupants fail to comply or prove lawful rights
- Reported demolition date
- August 30
- Supreme Court status
- The court agreed to consider listing the challenge but did not specify a hearing date
Quotes
Chief Justice Surya Kant
Chief Justice of India and member of the Supreme Court bench hearing the plea
“They must be unauthorised chambers”
theprint.in
“We will see”
theprint.in
Sources
Related news
Supreme Court Orders Demolition of Illegal Lucknow Court Constructions
Calcutta High Court Extends Stay on Amtala Office Demolition
Calcutta High Court Stays Demolition of Kolkata Construction
Calcutta High Court Halts Planned Demolition in Tollygunge
Supreme Court contempt notice to LDA Vice-Chairman in Lucknow fire
Gujarat High Court stops demolition of century-old burial ground
Supreme Court Questions IPS Deputation for CAPF Leadership Positions
Supreme Court Quashes 20-Year Conviction, Reaffirms Juvenile Legal Protections
Two Years After RG Kar Doctor's Rape-Murder, Case Remains Unresolved
ED widens Chhattisgarh probes with two arrests and searches
Delhi High Court Orders Madhya Pradesh to Pay Advocate Dues
