2 weeks ago

Supreme Court Quashes Rahul Gandhi Defamation Case Over Savarkar Remarks

Supreme Court Quashes Rahul Gandhi Defamation Case Over Savarkar Remarks
SC quashes criminal defamation complaint, summons against Rahul Gandhi for remarks against Savarkar · telegraphindia.com

Rahul Gandhi is an important leader in India's parliament.

During a big walk called the Bharat Jodo Yatra, he said things about a historic leader named Savarkar.

He called Savarkar a servant of the British and said he got a pension from them.

Some people were upset, and a lawyer named Nripendra Pandey filed a court case.

The lawyer said Gandhi wanted to spread hate in society.

But Indian law says some cases need permission from the state government before they go to court.

The Uttar Pradesh government never gave that permission.

So the highest court in India, the Supreme Court, cancelled the case and the summons against Gandhi.

The judges said the complaint could not stand without that permission.

Gandhi still faces another court case about things he said in London.

Key facts

Case type
Criminal defamation; summons invoked IPC Sections 153A and 505
Accused
Rahul Gandhi, Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha
Complainant
Advocate Nripendra Pandey
Ruling bench
Justices Dipankar Datta and Sheel Nagu
Remarks in question
November 17, 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra rally in Akola, Maharashtra (one article cited a 2022 press conference), calling Savarkar a "servant of the British" who received a British pension
Grounds for quashing
Uttar Pradesh government's affidavit disclosed no prosecution sanction
Key dates
Summons Dec 12, 2024; High Court refusal Apr 4, 2025; Supreme Court stay Apr 25, 2025
Related case
Satyaki Savarkar's defamation complaint over Gandhi's March 5, 2023 London speech, pending in Maharashtra

Quotes

Bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Sheel Nagu

Supreme Court Justices

“We have heard learned counsel for parties. In terms of the affidavit filed by the state of Uttar Pradesh, there is no disclosure of sanction having been granted. The orders passed by the learned magistrate… stand quashed.”
telegraphindia.com
“Maximum compensation may kindly be imposed upon the accused according to section 357 (Order to pay compensation) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).”
indianexpress.com

Supreme Court Bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Sheel Nagu

Supreme Court Justices who ruled on the defamation case

“"Additional Solicitor General and advocate for complainant, in the affidavit filed by UP, submits there is no disclosure of sanction. In such view of the matter, the complaint and orders passed by magistrate stands quashed."”
theprint.in telegraphindia.com

Sources

Related news