4 days ago
Court Rejects Bail Cancellation Plea Against Four Elgar Accused
A court allowed four people accused in the Elgar Parishad case to keep their bail.
The National Investigation Agency said they broke bail rules by attending a gathering at the Mumbai Press Club.
The agency believed the gathering could have involved support for a banned group.
The judge said the video showed the people were there but did not record sound.
The video also did not clearly show that they were discussing the banned group’s ideas.
The defence said the gathering was a general discussion and that the four had been invited by someone else.
The court said simply meeting or talking with other accused people was not enough to prove a bail violation.
However, the judge told them to be more careful and leave similar events in the future.
A special NIA court rejected the agency’s request to cancel the bail of Sudha Bharadwaj, Arun Ferreira, Vernon Gonsalves and Varavara Rao.
The NIA alleged that the four violated bail conditions by attending a January 19, 2026, gathering at the Mumbai Press Club.
The agency claimed the event was intended to promote Communist Party of India (Maoist) ideology and advance the “Urban Naxal” movement.
Judge Chakor S Baviskar said CCTV confirmed their presence but had no audio and did not prove what they discussed.
The court said they should have withdrawn from the event as a precaution, but noted that the Elgar Parishad trial has not begun.
- Who
- The four accused are Sudha Bharadwaj, Arun Ferreira, Vernon Gonsalves and Varavara Rao; the National Investigation Agency sought cancellation of their bail.
- What
- A special court refused to cancel their bail over alleged violations connected to a Mumbai Press Club gathering.
- Where
- The gathering took place at the Mumbai Press Club in Mumbai.
- When
- The gathering took place on January 19, 2026; the ruling was reported on August 29, with no ruling year specified in the reports.
- Why
- The NIA alleged that the gathering involved communication with co-accused and plans to promote Communist Party of India (Maoist) ideology, but the court found no acceptable evidence proving that purpose or a bail breach.
National Investigation Agency’s Allegations
Defence and Court’s Findings
Purpose of the gathering
National Investigation Agency’s Allegations
The NIA claimed the event was convened to propagate Communist Party of India (Maoist) ideology and discuss the future of the “Urban Naxal” movement.
Defence and Court’s Findings
The defence said the four were invited by a third party and took part in a general discussion, including issues such as prison conditions.
Alleged bail violation
National Investigation Agency’s Allegations
The agency argued that attending and communicating with co-accused breached a condition intended to prevent the accused from engaging in similar alleged activities.
Defence and Court’s Findings
The court held that ordinary interaction, including meeting or discussing a case, did not by itself prove a violation without acceptable evidence of similar activity.
CCTV evidence
National Investigation Agency’s Allegations
The NIA submitted CCTV footage to support its allegations about the gathering.
Defence and Court’s Findings
The court said the footage had no audio and that the visible mood and body language did not establish that the accused were discussing the banned organisation’s ideology.
Key facts
- Case
- Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case
- Court
- Special NIA court in Mumbai
- Judge
- Chakor S Baviskar
- Accused
- Sudha Bharadwaj, Arun Ferreira, Vernon Gonsalves and Varavara Rao
- Gathering
- January 19, 2026, at the Mumbai Press Club
- Evidence
- CCTV footage without audio and a Mumbai Press Club inquiry report
- Ruling
- Bail cancellation pleas rejected
- Trial status
- The trial has not yet begun
Quotes
Special Judge Chakor S. Baviskar
Judge presiding over the special court hearing the NIA’s bail-cancellation application
“Even otherwise, if the tempo, the temperament and overall mood of the function along with body language of the accused is any indication, it can hardly be concluded or even can be imagined that the accused were discussing the serious issues like ideology of the proscribed organisation”
theprint.in
“The accused is expected to take proper care and caution even to avoid the possibility of committing breach of any of the bail conditions.”
theprint.in
Special NIA court
The court hearing the bail cancellation application in the Elgar Parishad case.
“The accused could and should have recused themselves without participating further in the function and avoided the possibility of inviting such an application for cancellation of bail. The accused are expected to take proper care and caution to avoid even the possibility of breaching any of the bail conditions.”
freepressjournal.in
“Since the accused were well aware of the bail condition imposed, on seeing other accused gathered at the function dated January 19 at the terrace of Mumbai Press Club, to avoid further complications.”
freepressjournal.in
Sources
Related news
Mumbai Court Rejects NIA Plea to Cancel Activists’ Bail
BJP Corporator Akash Purohit Remanded to Judicial Custody
Ex-TISS Student Arrested After Court Rejects Bail in Saibaba Case
Bombay HC to Hear Bail Plea in Saibaba Slogans Case
Mumbai Court Grants Bail to Seven TISS Students, Rejects Two
NIA Court Rejects Shamil Nachan's Bail, Cites Suppression of Facts
Civil Liberties Groups Demand Release of Telangana Political Prisoners
Theatre artiste attacked by vigilantes after admitting he is Muslim
CJP Protest in Mumbai: Azad Maidan Restrictions and Controversy
