3 weeks ago
SC says no timeline for Bengal voter deletion appeal tribunals
Before a big election in West Bengal, a state in India, officials checked the list of people who could vote.
Many people were taken off the list.
If someone thought they were removed by mistake, they could ask a special court, called a tribunal, to put their name back.
So many people appealed that the tribunals became very slow.
Another court said that if things kept moving at that speed, it would take about 21 years to finish.
The highest court in India, the Supreme Court, talked about this problem.
It said it could not order a time limit for the tribunals to finish their work.
But it did ask the election office to share how many cases were finished and how many were still waiting.
Millions of voters were affected, and only a small number of names have been put back on the list so far.
The Supreme Court said it cannot set a timeline for appellate tribunals hearing appeals against voter deletions in West Bengal.
The court asked the Election Commission to provide details of cases disposed of and pending before the tribunals.
A bench headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant heard Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury's petition seeking speedy disposal of voter roll revision cases.
About 91 lakh voters, nearly 11.9% of West Bengal's pre-revision electorate, had been removed from the rolls by April 6.
Around 34 lakh appeals were pending ahead of the Assembly elections, 27 lakh of them from excluded voters; tribunals had restored 1,607 names.
- Who
- The Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant, the Election Commission, and Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury, who filed the petition.
- What
- The court declined to set a timeline for appellate tribunals hearing voter deletion appeals and asked the Election Commission to provide details of disposed and pending cases.
- Where
- West Bengal, India; the petition was heard by the Supreme Court.
- When
- Tuesday, following a July 8 Calcutta High Court observation that cases would take about 21 years at the current pace.
- Why
- Chowdhury sought speedy disposal of cases related to the special intensive revision of voter rolls, which had removed about 91 lakh voters ahead of the Assembly elections.
Key facts
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Bench
- Headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant
- Petitioner
- Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury
- Voters removed by April 6
- About 91 lakh (nearly 11.9% of the pre-revision electorate)
- Pending appeals
- About 34 lakh, including 27 lakh from excluded voters
- Names restored by tribunals
- 1,607
- Calcutta High Court observation
- Pending appeals would take about 21 years at the current pace
- Context
- Special intensive revision before the April Assembly elections
Quotes
Calcutta High Court
Judicial body hearing appeals on voter deletions
“"21 years …if appellate tribunals function at the current pace"”
scroll.in









