2 weeks ago
Magisterial Probe Ordered Into Forest Shootout Killing Three Suspected Poachers
Some people went into a forest in Karnataka, India, carrying guns.
Forest workers said the people were hunting animals without permission.
The forest workers said the hunters shot at them first, so they shot back to protect themselves.
Three of the hunters died, and one ran away.
The forest workers found bags of deer meat, which made them think the hunters were poachers.
The government is now investigating what happened.
The minister in charge said the workers will be punished if they did something wrong.
Some other politicians think the workers should not have shot the hunters and want a bigger investigation.
They also want money given to the families of the people who died.
The government says it will decide about money after the investigation is finished.
Karnataka Forest Minister Ramalinga Reddy told the Legislative Assembly that a magisterial probe is underway into the firing that killed three suspected poachers in the Hanur wildlife range.
The incident took place 5-8 km inside the forest from village boundaries early on the morning of August 15.
The deceased were identified as Antony Swami (50), John Rose Peter (42) and Kumar (33), while a fourth accused, Mahimadas (45), escaped.
Forest officials said they fired in self-defence after the alleged poachers, armed with illegal country-made pistols, attacked despite warnings; 20-30 kg of deer meat was seized.
Opposition BJP and JD(S) demanded a judicial probe, Rs 1 crore compensation for each deceased and Reddy's resignation, while Tamil Nadu Chief Minister C Joseph Vijay condemned the killings.
- Who
- Karnataka Forest Minister Ramalinga Reddy; three suspected poachers killed; opposition leaders R Ashoka (BJP/JD(S)) and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister C Joseph Vijay
- What
- A magisterial probe was ordered into a forest shootout in which forest department staff killed three suspected poachers in the Hanur wildlife range.
- Where
- Hanur wildlife range, Chamarajanagar district, Karnataka, India.
- When
- The incident occurred early on the morning of August 15; the minister's statement was made on Monday (PTI report dated August 17).
- Why
- Forest staff said they fired in self-defence after armed alleged poachers attacked despite warnings; opposition demanded accountability, a judicial probe and compensation.
Government & Forest Department
Opposition (BJP, JD(S)) & Critics
Type of investigation
Government & Forest Department
A magisterial probe is sufficient; any further probe would be considered only after its completion and discussions with the Chief Minister.
Opposition (BJP, JD(S)) & Critics
Demand a judicial probe into the incident, along with compensation and the minister's resignation.
Justification for firing
Government & Forest Department
Forest staff fired in self-defence after armed poachers attacked despite warnings; the action was taken solely for self-defence and protection of forest resources, with no malicious motive.
Opposition (BJP, JD(S)) & Critics
Question the close-range shooting and why personnel did not apprehend the men or fire below the waist; argue the men could have been arrested instead of killed.
Compensation for families
Government & Forest Department
Compensation can only be considered if the probe proves the deceased were not poachers.
Opposition (BJP, JD(S)) & Critics
Demand Rs 1 crore compensation for each of the deceased.
Key facts
- Probe type
- Magisterial inquiry (underway)
- Incident date
- August 15, early morning
- Location
- Hanur wildlife range, Chamarajanagar district, Karnataka
- Deceased
- Antony Swami (50), John Rose Peter (42), Kumar (33)
- Escaped accused
- Mahimadas (45)
- Seized items
- 20-30 kg deer meat, country-made pistols
- Investigating officer
- Dinesh Kumar Meena, IAS (Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Kollegala)
- Opposition demand
- Judicial probe, Rs 1 crore compensation per deceased, minister's resignation
Quotes
Ramalinga Reddy
Karnataka Forest Minister
“"The government would take merciless action against forest department personnel if they were found to have acted improperly."”
deccanchronicle.com
““merciless action””
theprint.in










